Special Issues

Special Issue Title: Caesarean Section Today - “Caesarology in the 21st Century”

· Print Special Issue Flyer

· Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2021


Special Issue Editor

Guest Editor


Prof. Dubravko Habek

Clinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sveti Duh University Hospital, Catholic University of Croatia Zagreb, Croatia

Website | E-Mail1 | E-Mail2

Interests: Operative and emergency obstetrics; Pelveoperineology;  Forensic gynecology and obstetrics; Deontology; Surgery; Medicohistoriography


Prof. Vesna Elvedi Gasparovic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

E-Mail

Interests: High risk pregnancy; emergency obstetrics; forensic obstetrics


Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,


Caesarean Section (CS) is a major surgical procedure that should be performed according to medically obstetric (>90%) and nonobstetrics (<10%) indications with 80% emergency and 20% elective CS. The relationship between elective CS and urgent CS has become inverted, as has the relationship between the existence of nonobstetricc indications and real obstetric indications in extremely high >30% CSs where they are performed.

CS has remained a clinically justified procedure as a life-saving surgical procedure for mother and/or baby but recently it has become a fashionable procedure as a consequence of various non-medical indications. Non–medical indicated CS has become a public health, epidemiologic, perinatal, pediatric, juristic, and deontological problem worldwide as it burdens the healthcare system and is beyond the reach of good clinical practice. Generally known, with increased rates of CS, incidence of previal and/or morbid invasive malplacentation in nulliparous increases from 5% to 67% in pregnant women with >4 CSs, while surgery, especially unplanned laparotomy and hysterectomy, as well as hemorrhagic obstetric shock, are direct predictors of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Today, when CS has become the most common obstetric operation, even more common than episiotomy, any clinical evaluation of this procedure is worth publishing: repeaed CS, vaginal birth after CS, evaluation of CSs techniques, CS in twin pregnancies, ethical dilemas in CS etc.


Prof. Dubravko Habek and Prof. Vesna Elvedi Gasparovic

Guest Editor

 

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at https://ceog.imrpress.org by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by IMR Press.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is $1250. We normally offer a discount about 30% (APC: $850) to all contributors invited by the Editor-in-Chief, Guest Editor (GE) and Editorial board member. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English.


Keywords

Caesarean section; good clinical practice; operative techniques and outcome


Share This Special Issue

      


Planned Papers

Title: The influence of Cesarean SEction on future female fertility
Authors: Johannes Ott



Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: an opinion
Dubravko Habek, Matija Prka, Anto Čartolovni, Anis Cerovac, Domagoj Dokozić
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology    2021, 48 (1): 1-4.   DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305
Abstract334)   HTML125)    PDF(pc) (165KB)(256)       Save

Increasing the incidence of caesarean section is not in line with professional and deontological guidelines. Elective cesarean section prevents primordial prevention of chronic cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, imunological, endocrinological morbidity by peripartal programming. Elective non-medical indicated caesarean section is not a procedure that respects deontological, clinical etics, scientific and professional principles. It is like an unacceptable surgery outside the scope of medical ethics. Clientelism in high-risk clinical obstetric medicine is not a professional and deontologically correct category: a physician should not be a provider on request of healthy pregnant women with the potential to have a medically incorrect procedure and complications associated with it and to put a healthy pregnant/maternity and child status in the patient's status. The financial, social, political and cultural components must not outweigh good clinical practice and the moral principles of medicine.
Related Articles | Metrics

Current Issue

  • Volume 48, Issue 2