Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2016, Vol. 43 Issue (6): 893-895    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3129.2016
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Interstitial ectopic pregnancy after salpingectomy due to previous tubal pregnancy - a case report
A. Marciniak1, J. Nawrocka-Rutkowska1, *(), I. Szydłowska1, B. Wiśniewska1, O. Wielgoszewska1, A. Starczewski1
1Department of Gynecology and Urogynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, Police (Poland)
Download:  PDF(153KB)  ( 8 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Ectopic pregnancy is the development of the embryo outside the uterine cavity. In recent years an increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies has been observed. It is mainly related to the increased number of IVF procedures. The most frequent localization is the ampulla of the fallopian tube. In cases of intramural or cornual ectopic pregnancies, many patients have a history of ectopic pregnancy on the same side or underwent partial salpingectomy in the past. Treatment of such pregnancies involves laparotomy and removal of the uterus or cornu of the uterus. This case concerns a patient operated because of intramural pregnancy. She had a salpingectomy in the past because of tubal ectopic pregnancy on the same side. This case shows that even after removal of the fallopian tube there is still a risk of ectopic pregnancy in the intramural part of this tube.
Key words:  Ectopic pregnancy      Intramural pregnancy      Surgical techniques     
Published:  10 December 2016     
*Corresponding Author(s):  J. NAWROCKA-RUTKOWSKA     E-mail:  jolanaw@poczta.onet.pl

Cite this article: 

A. Marciniak, J. Nawrocka-Rutkowska, I. Szydłowska, B. Wiśniewska, O. Wielgoszewska, A. Starczewski. Interstitial ectopic pregnancy after salpingectomy due to previous tubal pregnancy - a case report. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(6): 893-895.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3129.2016     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2016/V43/I6/893

[1] Qian Hu, Mohammed Sharooq Paramboor, Tao Guo. Diagnosis and management of intramural ectopic pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 974-979.
[2] Xiao-Hua Li, Jian-Kun Zhou, Jing-Dan Cheng. Application of ultrasound in hepatic pregnancy: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 434-438.
[3] J.R. Huang, X. Li, C. Fu, Y.H. Deng, T. Gao, H.W. Zhang. Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 900-905.
[4] M. Varras, C. Loukas, N. Nikiteas, V.K. Varra, F.N. Varra, E. Georgiou. Comparison of laparoscopic surgical skills acquired on a virtual reality simulator and a box trainer: an analysis for obstetrics-gynecology residents[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 755-763.
[5] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[6] G. Virdis, F. Dessole, A. Andrisani, A. Vitagliano, R. Cappadona, G. Capobianco, E. Cosmi, G. Ambrosini, S. Dessole. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of three cases and a critical review on the management[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 982-985.
[7] Z. Liu, M. Wan, H. Zhu. Fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy with renal duct cyst[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 986-987.
[8] W.D. Zou, Z.W. Liu, J. Zhang. Intramural pregnancy following transcervical resection of adhesion: a case and review literatures[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1017-1019.
[9] M. Meléndez Zalduegui, S. Iglesias Ferreiro, A. Rodríguez Vélez, ML. Monje Beltrán, EM. Vicedo Madrazo, RJ. Martínez Portillo, M. Llobet Roma, M. Marqueta Sánchez. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, a life threatening condition: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 313-316.
[10] A. Dobrosavljevic, B. Nikolic, A. Jurisisc, N. Zečević, R. Aničić, M. Jeftović. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical ectopic pregnancy - case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 139-140.
[11] Jing Fu, Na Hu, Lin Qiao, Qiang Yao. Cornual pregnancy with placenta percreta and uterine rupture at 19 weeks' gestation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 141-142.
[12] H. Bakhsh. Misdiagnosis of spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancy: a case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 168-170.
[13] Lieming Wen, Qichang Zhou, Shi Zeng. Gestational progression and blood supply assessment of a six-week primary hepatic pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 594-596.
[14] Munetoshi Akazawa, Yuzo Imachi, Kiyoshi Aiko, Kazushige Nakahara, Sachiko Onjo. Carcinoma of unknown primary site and ectopic pregnancy diagnosed at laparoscopic surgery: a rare coexistence[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 626-628.
[15] J. Hudecová, A. Hudec, Z. Novotný, D. Slouka. Pregnancy in the scar after myomectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 632-635.
No Suggested Reading articles found!