Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (3): 452-454    DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog.2020.03.5042
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
A case of stillbirth caused by rupture of an intrahepatic hemangioma and the wish for litigation
U. Indraccolo1, 2, *(), S.R. Indraccolo3, P. Greco4, P. Fedeli5
1Maternal-Infantile Department. Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Sant'Anna University Hospital of Ferrara – Cona, Italy
2Complex Operative Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology. "Alto Tevere" Hospital of Città di Castello. ASL 1 Umbria, Italy
3Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences. "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
4Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Obstetric and Gynaecology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
5School of Law, Legal medicine. University of Camerino, Italy
Download:  PDF(150KB)  ( 206 ) Full text   ( 7 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
A very uncommon case of an intrahepatic hemangioma rupture as a cause of a stillborn baby is presented. It seems that the event could not be detected. However, the idea of litigation pushed parents to ascertain hypothetical liability of physicians 10 years after the stillbirth. The reason that parents do not comprehend that such a rare event could occur and opt for litigation was investigated. The conclusion seems that some patients' beliefs do not agree with physician counseling and cause the failure of the medical goals for the best care; thus, an improvement in counseling would still be ineffective. Rather, lowering parents' expectations from medical assessments and care seems the right way to reduce the incidence of litigation.
Key words:  Fetal intrahepatic hemangioma      Stillbirth      Litigation     
Submitted:  09 November 2018      Accepted:  29 November 2018      Published:  15 June 2020     
*Corresponding Author(s):  UGO INDRACCOLO     E-mail:  ugo.indraccolo@libero.it

Cite this article: 

U. Indraccolo, S.R. Indraccolo, P. Greco, P. Fedeli. A case of stillbirth caused by rupture of an intrahepatic hemangioma and the wish for litigation. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 452-454.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.03.5042     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2020/V47/I3/452

[1] www.sigo.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Induzione-al-Travaglio-di-Parto.pdf (24 Sep 2018).
[2] Morimura Y., Fujimori K., Ishida T., Ito A., Momura Y., Sato A.: “Fetal hepatic hemangioma representing non-reassuring pattern in fetal heart rate monitoring”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2003, 29, 347.
doi: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00129.x pmid: 14641708
[3] Gembruch U., Baschat A.A., Gloeckner-Hoffmann K., Gortner L., Germer U.: “Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetuses with liver hemangiomata”. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 19, 454.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00689.x pmid: 11982977
[4] Walton J.M., Rubin S.Z., Soucy P., Benzie R., Ash K., Nimrod C.: “Fetal tumors associated with hydrops: the role of the pediatric surgeon”. J. Pediatr. Surg., 1993, 28, 1151.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(93)90152-b pmid: 8308682
[5] Tawes R.L. Jr., Nelson J.A., Hyde J.A. Jr.: “Hepatic hemangioma: successful resection in a neonate”. Surgery., 1971, 70, 782.
pmid: 5166102
[6] Isaacs. H. Jr.: “Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors”. J. Pediatr. Surg., 2007, 42, 1797.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.047
[7] Aslan H., Dural O., Yildirim G., Acar D.K.: “Prenatal diagnosis of a liver cavernous hemangioma”. Fetal. Pediatr. Pathol., 2013, 32, 341.
doi: 10.3109/15513815.2013.768737
[8] Indraccolo U., Indraccolo S.R., Fedeli P.: “Another Case of de novo 3q26.33q27.3 microdeletion and its medicolegal sequel”. Case. Rep. Obstet. Gynecol., 2018, 2018, 1909056.
doi: 10.1155/2018/1909056 pmid: 29552365
[9] Indraccolo U., Scutiero G., Greco P.: “Correction of the sensitivity reported in the 2015 Italian Society of Obstetrical and Gynecological Ecography (SIEOG) guidelines for the ecographic screening of fetal malformations: a meta-analytic approach”. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol., 2018, 45, 651.
[10] Indraccolo U., Scutiero G., Matteo M., Indraccolo S.R., Greco P.: “Cesarean section on maternal request: should it be formally prohibited in Italy?” Ann. Ist. Sup. Sanita., 2015, 51, 162.
[11] Indraccolo U.: “Punches and knocks to the physicians: choosing wisely or self-protection?” Recenti. Prog. Med., 2016, 107, 607.
doi: 10.1701/2484.25982 pmid: 27869883
[12] Indraccolo U., Indraccolo S.R., Greco P., Fedeli P.: “A case of stillbirth for rupture of intrahepatic hemangioma and the wish of litigation”. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol., 2020, 47, 86.
[1] L. Roncati, A. Manenti, F. Piscioli. Brainstem injury in victims of sudden intrauterine death syndrome (SIUDS) and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 349-352.
[2] C. Goudeli, L. Aravantinos, D. Mpotsis, G. Creatsas, A. Kondi-Pafiti. Clinicopathological changes of perinatal mortality during the last 20 years in a tertiary hospital of Greece[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(5): 734-739.
[3] K. Sameera Begum, K. Sachchithanantham, S. Somsubhra De. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 38(1): 14-20.
[4] S. Meagher, E. Murphy, N. Badawi, J. Murphy. Resuscitating fresh stillbirths[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993, 20(1): 5-8.
No Suggested Reading articles found!