Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (1): 37-40    DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog.2020.01.4966
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Can pregnancy following muscle-sparing transverse abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps be safe on abdominal wall?
K.-C. Moon1, J.-M. Lee1, E.-S. Yoon1, *(), B.-I. Lee1, S.-H. Park1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Download:  PDF(8023KB)  ( 230 ) Full text   ( 15 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate patients with pregnancy following muscle-sparing transverse abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps and introduce some cases to determine outcomes including safety and timing of pregnancy following MSTRAM flap. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 917 breast reconstruction between March 2000 and September 2017 was performed. Of these 917 patients, 35 patients aged under 40 years visited the Department of Obstetrics following breast reconstructions using MS-TRAM flaps. Pregnancy following MS-TRAM flaps was determined by reviewing medical records and/or telephone interviews. Results: Two patients were followed up accordingly and they proceeded to delivery. Postpartum follow-up showed no complication. No evidence of disease or abdominal wall complication was found during a maximum of nine years. Conclusions: This case study highlights successful pregnancy following MS-TRAM flap within the shortest interval after surgery.

Key words:  Abdominal wall      Breast reconstruction      Delivery      Fascia      Pregnancy      TRAM     
Published:  15 February 2020     
*Corresponding Author(s):  E.-S. Yoon     E-mail:  yesanam2@korea.ac.kr

Cite this article: 

K.-C. Moon, J.-M. Lee, E.-S. Yoon, B.-I. Lee, S.-H. Park. Can pregnancy following muscle-sparing transverse abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps be safe on abdominal wall?. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 37-40.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.01.4966     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2020/V47/I1/37

Figure 1.  — Flow chart of patients included in this study (n = number of patients).

Figure 2.  — Abdominal CT showing a fetus at 28 weeks of gestation after MS-TRAM flap. Axial view (left), and coronal view (right).

Figure 3.  — A patient became pregnant just before MS-TRAM flap. Postoperative photograph of patient at five weeks after MS-TRAM flap (left). Postoperative photograph at 4 months after surgery (20 weeks of gestation) (middle). Postoperative photograph at ten months after surgery (1.5 months after delivery) (right).

Figure 4.  — An intraoperative photograph after flap harvest of MS-TRAM flap.

Figure 5.  — A patient became pregnant after six months following MS-TRAM flap. Preoperative photograph of patient with design for MS-TRAM flap (left). Postoperative photograph at three years after surgery (1.8 years after delivery) (right).

[1] Chai S.C., Umayaal S., Saad A.Z.: “Successful pregnancy “during” pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction with normal vaginal delivery”. Indian. J. Plast. Surg., 2015, 48, 81.
[2] Parodi P.C., Osti M., Longhi P., Rampino E., Anania G., Riberti C.: “Pregnancy and tram-flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a case report”. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand. Surg., 2001, 35, 211.
[3] Zeligson G., Hadar A., Koretz M., Silberstein E., Krieger Y., Bogdanov-Berezovsky A.: “Uneventful pregnancy and delivery after TRAM flap reconstruction following bilateral mastectomies”. Isr. Med. Assoc. J., 2011, 13, 381.
[4] Won Y.J., Sung J., Jung K.W., Kong H.J., Park S., Shin H.R., et al.: “Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 2003-2005”. Cancer. Res. Treat., 2009, 41, 122-31.
[5] Carramaschi F.R., Ramos M.L., Pinotti J.A., Ferreira M.C.: “Pregnancy Following Breast Reconstruction with TRAM Flaps”. Breast J., 1998, 4, 258.
[6] Wagner L.H., Ruth-Sahd L.A.: “Pregnancy after a TRAM flap procedure: principles of nursing care”. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal. Nurs., 2000, 29, 363.
[7] Bhat W., Akhtar S., Akali A.: “Pregnancy in the early stages following DIEP flap breast reconstruction—a review and case report”. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg., 2010, 63, e782.
[8] Nahabedian M.Y., Tsangaris T., Momen B.: “Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing(MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2005, 115, 436.
[9] Bajaj A.K., Chevray P.M., Chang D.W.: “Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2006, 117, 737.
[10] Momeni A., Kim R.Y., Heier M., Bannasch H., Stark G.B.: “Abdominal wall strength: a matched-pair analysis comparing muscle-sparing TRAM flap donor-site morbidity with the effects of abdominoplasty”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2010, 126, 1454.
[11] Selber J.C., Fosnot J., Nelson J., Goldstein J., Bergey M., Sonnad S., et al.: “A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2010, 126, 1438.
[12] Man L.X., Selber J.C., Serletti J.M.: “Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review”. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2009, 124, 752.
[1] Amanda M. Wang, Alan J. Lee, Shannon M. Clark. The effects of overweight and obesity on pregnancy-related morbidity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 999-1009.
[2] Leen Van den Eeden, Greet Leysens,Dominique Mannaerts, Yves Jacquemyn. Air pollution: cardiovascular and other negative effects on pregnancy: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1010-1016.
[3] Xin Du, Qian Zou, Yu-Lan Liu. Transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by uterine artery pre-ligation: a report of 4 cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1044-1047.
[4] Marcelo Epsztein Kanczuk, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Alison Pighills, Antony Ji, Casey Steele, Daniel Bartlett. The time to perform spinal or general anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients requiring emergency caesarean delivery: a prospective crossover simulation study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1099-1106.
[5] Noor Hazim Abdulkareem, Elham Hazeim Abdulkareem. SARS-CoV-2 detection in pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1141-1145.
[6] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[7] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[8] Min Jung Kim, Hee-Sook Lim, Hae-Hyeog Lee, Tae-Hee Kim, Yongsoon Park. Dietary assessment, nutrition knowledge, and pregnancy outcome in high-risk pregnant Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1178-1185.
[9] Neha Sethi, Ann Gee Tan, Maherah Kamarudin, Sofiah Sulaiman. Successful delivery of a twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1232-1247.
[10] Luca Roncati, Greta Gianotti, Elisa Ambrogi, Giovanna Attolini. COVID-19 in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 778-780.
[11] Silvia Amodeo, Giulia Bonavina, Anna Seidenari, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Antonio Farina. Real-world implementation and adaptation to local settings of first trimester preeclampsia screening in Italy: a systematic review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 812-819.
[12] Yu Deng, Zhan-Hui Ou, Min-Na Yin, Pei-Ling Liang, Zhi-Heng Chen, Abraham Morse, Ling Sun. Age and anti-Műllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization with diminished ovarian reserve[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 835-841.
[13] Serdar Balci. The effect of ultraviolet index measurements on levels of vitamin D andinflammatory markers in pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 888-892.
[14] Anna M. Rubinshtein, Oleg V. Golyanovskiy. Obstetric outcomes in women of advanced maternal age after assisted reproduction[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 893-900.
[15] Valeria Filippi, Luigi Raio, Sophia Amylidi-Mohr, Rudolf Tschudi, Daniele Bolla. Epidural analgesia at trial of labour after caesarean section. A retrospective cohort study over 12 years[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 913-917.
No Suggested Reading articles found!