Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (4): 627-629    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3476.2017
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Laparoscopic management of a bilateral ovarian pregnancy after failed methotrexate treatment
J. Lee1, K.J. Kim1, *(), K.M. Lee2, K.A. Kim1, S.Ki Hong1, S.K. Baek1, J. Mun1, S. Bak1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeon-ju, Korea
2 Department of Obstetrics and Pathology, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeon-ju, Korea
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  To date, there have been three reported cases of bilateral ovarian pregnancy including the case reported here. As infertility has increased, so has the use of assisted reproductive techniques and in turn, the incidence of rare forms of ectopic pregnancy. The authors report a 32-year-old woman who underwent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and was shown to have an ectopic pregnancy through pelvic ultrasonography and serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin. She was unsuccessfully treated medically (methotrexate single dose injection) and an emergency laparoscopy was subsequently performed. The laparoscopic finding was that both fallopian tubes appeared normal but a bilateral ovarian pregnancy was confirmed. Resection of the ectopic tissue was performed. Of the published cases of bilateral ovarian pregnancy, this is the only case managed laparoscopically. This case is of clinical significance as preserving as much ovarian tissue as possible is key in preserving fertility and promoting a quick recovery.
Key words:  Fertilization in vitro      Laparoscopy      Ovarian pregnancy     
Published:  10 August 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  K.J. KIM     E-mail:  kyungjin_k@hotmail.com

Cite this article: 

J. Lee, K.J. Kim, K.M. Lee, K.A. Kim, S.Ki Hong, S.K. Baek, J. Mun, S. Bak. Laparoscopic management of a bilateral ovarian pregnancy after failed methotrexate treatment. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 627-629.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3476.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I4/627

[1] Ranit Hizkiyahu, Shannon Salvador, Michael H. Dahan. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in a woman with borderline serous ovarian tumor causing a large fluctuating subcutaneous fluid collection: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1215-1218.
[2] Üzeyir Kalkan, Murat Yassa, Kadir Bakay, Şafak Hatırnaz. Mechanical bowel preparation prior to gynaecological laparoscopy enables better operative field visualization, lower pneumoperitoneum pressure and Trendelenburg angle during the surgery: a perspective that may add to patient safety[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 842-850.
[3] Basilio Pecorino, Giuseppe Scibilia, Placido Borzì, Maria Elena Vento, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Paolo Scollo. Diminished ovarian reserve and ectopic ovaries in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome candidates for Uterus Transplantation: our experience[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 907-912.
[4] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[5] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[6] M.S. Kim, E.D. Na, H.C. Kim, M. Kim, S.Y. Shin, M.H. Lee. Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn with multiple leiomyomas in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 968-971.
[7] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[8] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[9] G. Szabó, J. Rigó Jr.. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy of ovarian origin[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 977-979.
[10] R. T. Ratner, A. Harris, J. Tsaltas, N. Goyal, M. Davies-Tuck, H. Najjar, O. Barel. An eight-year retrospective analysis of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, outcomes and complications in a large multicenter unit[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 699-703.
[11] A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.
[12] M. Simonsen, L. Martins Campbell, R. Moretti Marques. Uterine manipulator - low budget option[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 575-577.
[13] N.N. Chavan, R. Deshmukh, N. Raj. An observational study on diagnosis and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 583-586.
[14] S. Matsuoka, H. Tsujioka, M. Ando, Y. To, T. Koyanagi, H. Kondo, F. Eguchi. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with a tiny ovarian teratoma diagnosed by exploratory laparoscopy: report of two cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 305-308.
[15] A. Daniilidis, K. Chatzistamatiou, M. Siskou, ü. Kalkan, T. Theodoridis, S. Angioni. Vault prolapse occurrence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy performed for benign indications, is there a difference? A systematic review of the literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 183-185.
No Suggested Reading articles found!