Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (4): 613-615    DOI: 10.12891/ceog2034.2017
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Bilateral rupture of the renal pelvis as a complication of placental abruption in multiparous female
H.G. Kim1, Y.J. Na1, Y.J. Song1, J. Yang1, O.H. Choi1, *()
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yangsan Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan, Korea
Download:  PDF(476KB)  ( 66 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  A non-traumatic rupture of renal pelvis during pregnancy is an extremely rare complication. The authors report a case of bilateral rupture of the renal pelvis in a multiparous female who underwent emergency cesarean section during vaginal birth after previous cesarean section, owing to abrupt and massive vaginal bleeding and prolonged fetal late deceleration. During surgery, a disproportionately enlarged uterus was noted and postoperatively severe oliguria was complicated with a sustainable amount of packed RBCs transfusion. CT revealed extravasation of contrast media around bilateral perinephric space. Treatment course and review of the cause of renal pelvis rupture is discussed along with literature study.
Key words:  Placental abruption      Kidney pelvis      Cesarean section      Vaginal birth after cesarean      Extravasation     
Published:  10 August 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  OOK HWAN CHOI     E-mail:  ohchoi@pusan.ac.kr

Cite this article: 

H.G. Kim, Y.J. Na, Y.J. Song, J. Yang, O.H. Choi. Bilateral rupture of the renal pelvis as a complication of placental abruption in multiparous female. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 613-615.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog2034.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I4/613

[1] Athanasia Tsaroucha, Aliki Tympa Grigoriadou, Tania Moshovou, Kassiani Theodoraki, Aikaterini Melemeni. Efficacy of intrathecally administered fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a double blinded, randomized clinical trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1065-1070.
[2] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[3] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[4] Lorenz Hinterleitner, Herbert Kiss, Johannes Ott. The impact of Cesarean section on female fertility: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 781-786.
[5] Dragan Belci, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Davor Zoričić, Andrea Tinelli, Antonio Malvasi, Michael Stark. Less is more—a minimal approach technique for Cesarean Section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 478-482.
[6] Eser Ağar, Gökhan Karakoç. Comparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 534-539.
[7] Lejla Kamerić, Anis Cerovac, Mirzeta Rizvanović, Alen Kamerić, Mahira Jahić, Dubravko Habek. Frequency of cesarean section in pregnant women with risk factors for preeclampsia: prospective cohort study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 561-566.
[8] Batool Ali H. Alkhazal, Majed Abdullah Halawani, Ibtihal Omar Alsahabi, Hassan S.O. Abduljabbar. The preferred mode of delivery among primigravida Middle Eastern Women. A questionnaire based study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 567-571.
[9] Faris Mujezinović, Veronika Anzeljc, Monika Sobočan, Iztok Takač. Do women in Slovenia prefer vaginal birth after prior caesarean and what hinders its successful outcome? A single institution retrospective analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 607-614.
[10] Ryuichi Shimaoka, Tomomi Shiga, Ken-ichirou Morishige. Change in uterine artery blood flow with intrauterine balloon tamponade[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 307-311.
[11] Bara'a Samara, Anton R. Sabella. The knowledge and attitudes of Palestinian women towards different childbirth delivery options[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 138-143.
[12] Jing Wang, Min Zhou, Li Zhang, Long-Xin Zhang. Effective doses 50% and 95% of subarachnoid injection of sufentanil with ropivacaine in lumbar anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 105-109.
[13] J.R. Huang, X. Li, C. Fu, Y.H. Deng, T. Gao, H.W. Zhang. Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 900-905.
[14] N.K. Aref. Rectal misoprostol after cesarean delivery: does it affect recovery of bowel functions? A prospective randomized trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 906-910.
[15] H. Takahashi, Y. Baba, R. Usui, S. Nagayama, K. Horie, A. Ohkuchi, S. Matsubara. Proteinuria as a novel risk factor for allogeneic blood transfusion irrespective of single or twin pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 709-713.
No Suggested Reading articles found!