Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (4): 591-594    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3644.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Evaluation of vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy
A. Kitamura1, 3, Y. Kobayashi1, 4, *(), Y. Hattori1, K. Watanabe1, M. Hino1, T. Kurahashi1, M. Miwa2, I. Kamimaki2, H. Nakagawa1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Saitama National Hospital, Saitama, Japan
2 Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Saitama National Hospital, Saitama, Japan
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Careful management of twin pregnancy is needed because of the high risk for mother and babies, and it is uncertain if vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery is favorable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the mode of delivery on maternal complications and short-term neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancy. Of the 50 cases, vaginal deliveries were attempted in 25 cases, with 17 achieving successful vaginal delivery of both twins and eight requiring emergency cesarean delivery. The other 25 cases underwent planned cesarean delivery. There were no differences in the neonatal outcome including birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical artery pH between cases with successful and failed vaginal delivery, or between failed vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery, even though vaginal delivery failed in some cases. These findings suggest that vaginal delivery can be attempted safely in twin pregnancy.
Key words:  Twin pregnancy      Vaginal delivery      Cesarean delivery     
Published:  10 August 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  Y. KOBAYASHI     E-mail:  kobax@a2.keio.jp

Cite this article: 

A. Kitamura, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Hattori, K. Watanabe, M. Hino, T. Kurahashi, M. Miwa, I. Kamimaki, H. Nakagawa. Evaluation of vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 591-594.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3644.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I4/591

[1] S. Srisukho, K. Srisupundit, T. Tongsong. Fulfillment of the criteria for diagnosis of cephalo-pelvic disproportion: ACOG guidelines[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 500-504.
[2] Y.Q. Xu, X. L. Chen, S. Zhao, P. W. Chen, X. M. Yin, S. Y. Xiong, Z. Ding, F. Xiong, X. H. Yang. OEIS complex (omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defects) in monozygotic twins: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 154-158.
[3] M. Aslam, Areej Ghormulla Alghamdi, Nawal G. Alghamdi, Khushnoor Khan. Monitoring and assessing pre-labor obstetric practicesc using control charts: cesarean delivery cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 570-574.
[4] L. Wang, N. Zhao, J. Zhou, M. Xu. Factors for predicting cesarean section during epidural analgesia: a retrospective study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 443-446.
[5] N. Yachida, M. Itsukaichi, K. Haino, T. Usuda, J. Yoshimura, T. Enomoto, M. Yamaguchi, K. Takakuwa. Influence of route of delivery on perinatal outcomes in fetuses with myelomeningocele[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 277-279.
[6] Mostafa Maleki, Mohsen Shams, Ali Mousavizadeh, Saadat Parhizkar, Parvin Angha. Development of a tailored intervention to promote normal vaginal delivery among primigravida women: a formative study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 886-892.
[7] Yun Chen, Yunli Lai, Shang Yi, Yanqing Tang, Yaqin Lei, Sheng Yi, Yiping Shen, Hongwei Wei. Non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in twin pregnancies by cell-free DNA analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 656-660.
[8] M. Paccosi. A technique variant for the use of the vacuum extractor with episiotomy to reduce maternal injuries[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 713-719.
[9] Hui-Dong Li, Zhi-Kun Zhang, Shuang Guo, Peng-Peng Qu. The application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancies[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 731-734.
[10] H. Tanaka, S. Maki, M. Kubo, H. Yuasa, T. Umekawa, T. Ikeda. Treatment using tadalafil for dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy with fetal growth restriction[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 591-593.
[11] T.J. Bozorgan, M. Motevasselian, S. Esmaeili, B. AmirNazari, H. Zendedel. Septic pelvic thrombophlebitis following cesarean delivery: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 612-614.
[12] O. Koukoura, V. Plitsis, E. Vlachakis, A. Daponte, I. Bizakis, I. Hajiioannou. A rare case of vaginal delivery in a woman with tracheostomy due to bilateral vocal cord paralysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 618-619.
[13] Ze Chen, Xiaoping Lei, Yongjun Zhang. The effects of fetal gender on pregnancy induced hypertension in twin pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 353-356.
[14] K. Roloff, A. Gray, V.J. Guillermo. Repeat cesarean delivery in the 39-week rule era: outcomes at a community based hospital[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 391-395.
[15] HV. Gall, M. Cukelj, R. Ribicic, I. Djakovic, V. Kosec. Fetal tachyarrhythmia in twin pregnancy - case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 450-451.
No Suggested Reading articles found!