Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (3): 337-340    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3590.2017
Review | Next articles
Horner’s syndrome and epidural anesthesia in labor and cesarean section
T. Vogiatzaki1, P. Tsikouras2, *(), T. Tsoleridis1, M. Bachar2, C. Christofis1, A. Liberis2, G. Galazios2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, Greece
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, Greece
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Horner's syndrome (HS) is based on dysfunction of symphathetic nervous system at the cervical canal. The signs of the syndrome occur on the same side as the lesion of the sympathetic trunk and include: a constricted pupil, a weak-droopy eyelid, apparent decreased sweating, and with or without inset eyeball. HS has been observed as a rare complication of epidural anaesthesia in obstetrics during labour or cesarean section. In parturients, it warrants further investigation as other serious causes must be excluded, such as pancoast tumours, thoracic aortic aneurysms, carotid dissection, neuroblastoma, and brainstem vascular malformation. Management involves early diagnosis of the underlying benign condition while treatment is based on appropriate conservative observation, as most often the syndrome resolves spontaneously. However in very rare cases immediate medical or surgical management is needed.
Key words:  Horner’s syndrome      Epidural anaesthesia      Vaginal labor      Cesarean section     
Published:  10 June 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  P. TSIKOURAS     E-mail:  ptsikour@med.duth.gr

Cite this article: 

T. Vogiatzaki, P. Tsikouras, T. Tsoleridis, M. Bachar, C. Christofis, A. Liberis, G. Galazios. Horner’s syndrome and epidural anesthesia in labor and cesarean section. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(3): 337-340.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3590.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I3/337

[1] Athanasia Tsaroucha, Aliki Tympa Grigoriadou, Tania Moshovou, Kassiani Theodoraki, Aikaterini Melemeni. Efficacy of intrathecally administered fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a double blinded, randomized clinical trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1065-1070.
[2] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[3] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[4] Lorenz Hinterleitner, Herbert Kiss, Johannes Ott. The impact of Cesarean section on female fertility: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 781-786.
[5] Dragan Belci, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Davor Zoričić, Andrea Tinelli, Antonio Malvasi, Michael Stark. Less is more—a minimal approach technique for Cesarean Section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 478-482.
[6] Eser Ağar, Gökhan Karakoç. Comparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 534-539.
[7] Lejla Kamerić, Anis Cerovac, Mirzeta Rizvanović, Alen Kamerić, Mahira Jahić, Dubravko Habek. Frequency of cesarean section in pregnant women with risk factors for preeclampsia: prospective cohort study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 561-566.
[8] Batool Ali H. Alkhazal, Majed Abdullah Halawani, Ibtihal Omar Alsahabi, Hassan S.O. Abduljabbar. The preferred mode of delivery among primigravida Middle Eastern Women. A questionnaire based study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 567-571.
[9] Faris Mujezinović, Veronika Anzeljc, Monika Sobočan, Iztok Takač. Do women in Slovenia prefer vaginal birth after prior caesarean and what hinders its successful outcome? A single institution retrospective analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 607-614.
[10] Ryuichi Shimaoka, Tomomi Shiga, Ken-ichirou Morishige. Change in uterine artery blood flow with intrauterine balloon tamponade[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 307-311.
[11] Bara'a Samara, Anton R. Sabella. The knowledge and attitudes of Palestinian women towards different childbirth delivery options[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 138-143.
[12] Jing Wang, Min Zhou, Li Zhang, Long-Xin Zhang. Effective doses 50% and 95% of subarachnoid injection of sufentanil with ropivacaine in lumbar anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 105-109.
[13] J.R. Huang, X. Li, C. Fu, Y.H. Deng, T. Gao, H.W. Zhang. Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 900-905.
[14] N.K. Aref. Rectal misoprostol after cesarean delivery: does it affect recovery of bowel functions? A prospective randomized trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 906-910.
[15] H. Takahashi, Y. Baba, R. Usui, S. Nagayama, K. Horie, A. Ohkuchi, S. Matsubara. Proteinuria as a novel risk factor for allogeneic blood transfusion irrespective of single or twin pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 709-713.
No Suggested Reading articles found!