Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (1): 110-112    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3309.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy induced hypertension: an observational study
G. Kennady1, 5, M.J. Kottarathara2, A.J. Kottarathara3, *(), R. Ajith4, T.M. Anandakesavan5, K. Ambujam1
1 Department of Obstetrics, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India
2 Department of Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvalla, India
3 Department of Nephrology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA
Department of Statistics, Government Medical College Kottayam, Kottayam, Kerala, India
5 Department of Pediatrics, Government Medical College, Thrissur, India
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Hypertension during pregnancy has been extensively studied due to significant maternal morbidity, mortality, and perinatal mortality that may result. The outcome in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy vary significantly across populations and between institutions serving the same populace. Objective: In the present study, the authors sought to determine the outcome for mother and fetus with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) in a rural community at a tertiary care center at Thrissur Medical College, Kerala, India. Materials and Methods: The authors included all singleton pregnancies with hypertensive disease that had deliveries in our institution in a sixmonth period excluding the ones with pre-existing hypertension and other comorbidities. Results: 46.5% of the patients required a cesarean section, 37.2% had pre-term labor, 52.4% had low birth weight, and 9.4% unfortunately were stillborn. Discussion: These results emphasize the need for screening and close follow-up of hypertension in pregnancy for safeguarding fetal and maternal wellbeing. Even after practicing the current standard of care, the higher rate of complications associated with PIH is unacceptable. The authors feel that unique management protocols should be implemented for different patient populations, based on ethnicity, lifestyle, and availability of medical resources.
Key words:  Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH)      Low birth weight      Perinatal mortality     
Published:  10 February 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  A.J. KOTTARATHARA     E-mail:  arunkottarathara@gmail.com

Cite this article: 

G. Kennady, M.J. Kottarathara, A.J. Kottarathara, R. Ajith, T.M. Anandakesavan, K. Ambujam. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy induced hypertension: an observational study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(1): 110-112.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3309.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I1/110

[1] Momina Zulfeen, Rekha Upadhyay, Sapna V. Amin, Muralidhar V. Pai, Leslie Lewis. What do the numbers say? - Introduction of the WHO ICD-PM classification and fetuses-at risk approach in perinatal audit, South India[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 144-150.
[2] L. Xie, X. Ru, Y. Xu, Y.F. Ouyang, S.Y. Shu. A low birth weight infant with unexpected hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture: A case report and review of the literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 455-458.
[3] A. Simsek, S. Uludag, A. Tuten, A. S. Acikgoz, S. Uludag. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in early onset and late onset preeclampsia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 837-841.
[4] C. Goudeli, L. Aravantinos, D. Mpotsis, G. Creatsas, A. Kondi-Pafiti. Clinicopathological changes of perinatal mortality during the last 20 years in a tertiary hospital of Greece[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(5): 734-739.
[5] Y.M. Xu, X.P. Zhu, Z. Xiao, L. Yu, X. Zhao. Influence of aggressive nutritional support on growth and development of very low birth weight infants[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014, 41(6): 717-722.
[6] F. Louwen, I. Antwerpen, T. Ernst, L. Reichenbach, A. Reitter, E. Herrmann, J. Yuan, J. Reinhard. Outcome in single and twin pregnancies at 20 to 24 weeks gestation: ten years experience in one perinatal center[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 40(3): 342-344.
[7] H.A. Alchalabi, R. Al Habashneh, O. Al Jabali, Y.S. Khader. Association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women in Jordan[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 40(3): 399-402.
[8] Y. Jacquemyn, N. Benjahia, G. Martens, H. Yüksel, K. Van Egmond, M. Temmerman. Pregnancy outcome of Moroccan and Turkish women in Belgium[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012, 39(2): 181-185.
[9] M. Erdemoglu, A. Kale, U. Kuyumcuoglu, N. Akdeniz, A.I. Güzel. Umbilical cord prolapse in the southeast region of Turkey: evaluation of 79 cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010, 37(2): 141-143.
[10] P. Anastasiadis, P. Tsikouras, G. Galazios, V. Liberis, X. Grapsas, N. Koutlaki, A. F. Anastasiadis. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: risk factors and epidemiologic analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007, 34(3): 154-158.
[11] N. Makris, A. Xygakis, A. Chionis, G. Sakellaropoulos, S. Michalas. The management of breech presentation in the last three decades[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999, 26(3-4): 178-180.
[12] B. KAPLAN, D. RABINERSON, M. HIRSCH, R. MASHIACH, M.HOD,A. NERI. Intrapartum management of the low-birth-weight breech fetus[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995, 22(4): 307-311.
[13] A. S. Gulisano, M. Panella, P. Panella, G. Pepe, E. Parano, C. Saia, F. Pepe. New trends in cesarean section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1987, 14(1): 45-47.
No Suggested Reading articles found!