Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 800-804    DOI: 10.12891/ceog5006.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Patient perspectives of gynecologists as their primary provider of routine vaccinations
M.S. Harrison1, *(), J.F. Thomas1, J. Pyrzanowski1, S.E. Brewer1, S.T. O’Leary1, A.F. Dempsey1
1University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA
Download:  PDF(303KB)  ( 197 ) Full text   ( 6 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Background: Uptake of recommended adult vaccines is suboptimal; thus, every visit to a medical provider is a potential opportunity to vaccinate. Many women view their gynecologist as their primary care provider (PCP), yet little is known about women’s attitudes towards receiving vaccines in this setting. Objective: The present authors’ objectives were to determine women’s use of their gynecologist as their primary provider of routinely recommended vaccinations, their desire and comfort to receive immunizations from them, and their perceptions of their gynecologist’s care in delivery of vaccines. Study Design: A survey among women who sought gynecological care at one of nine obstetrics and gynecology practices in Colorado from February to April, 2014. Results: Among a sample of 518 women who sought gynecology care at one of nine obstetrics and gynecology practices, 87.4% of participants reported that if their gynecologist recommended a vaccine to them, they would get it, and 97.3% trusted their gynecologists as a source of information about the benefits and risks of vaccinations. Women responded that their gynecologist’s office was not the only place they could receive vaccines, but that the majority would expect their gynecologist to inquire about their vaccination status, carry routinely recommended adult vaccines, and be able to answer their questions about immunizations. The survey also found that the majority of women had not been asked about their influenza or pertussis status at their most recent gynecologic visit. Conclusion: Most women trust their gynecologist to serve as their source of vaccines and vaccine education. Gynecologists should consider the cost- and risk-benefit of providing routinely recommended adult vaccines in their practices to both meet patient demand and fulfill their PCP role as part of the broad spectrum of gynecologic care.

Key words:  Gynecologist      Immunization      Patient perspectives      Vaccine     
Published:  10 October 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  M.S. HARRISON     E-mail:  margo.harrison@ucdenver.edu

Cite this article: 

M.S. Harrison, J.F. Thomas, J. Pyrzanowski, S.E. Brewer, S.T. O’Leary, A.F. Dempsey. Patient perspectives of gynecologists as their primary provider of routine vaccinations. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 800-804.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog5006.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I5/800

[1] K. Nakanishi, Y. Oishi, T. Miyamoto, E. Nakamura, K. Murakami, M. Ono, A. Nozawa, S. Kitamura, K. Sengoku. Anti-E alloimmunization in a pregnancy with a low antibody titer[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 614-616.
[2] S. Mattar, A. Nassar, L. Ghulmiyyah, S. Haddad, H. Tamim, E. Hobeika. Factors that affect women's choice of their obstetrician and gynecologist: a survey of Lebanese women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 408-412.
[3] D. Yulong, C. Jianing, L. Wenchao, W. Yingfeng, L. Chong, W. Lin, H. Xianliang, D. Hongyan. Immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in children born to HBsAg positive mothers: a meta-regression analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 437-440.
[4] H. Sonnemans, A. Schmid, J. Muys, Y. Jacquemyn. Flemish obstetricians’ personal preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term births[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(6): 792-794.
[5] M. Yoshida, H. Matsuda, K. Furuya. Two cases of measles in pregnant women immediately preceding delivery (Case Report)[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 38(2): 177-179.
[6] L. M. M. Nardozza, G. R. Lobo, A. F. Moron, L. Camano, E. Araujo, Jr., H. A. Guimarães Filho. Anti-Lewis alloimmunization: report of seven cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008, 35(4): 237-239.
[7] B. Kaplan, R. Orvietob, Y. Yogev, Y. Simon. Social aspects of the new assisted reproduction technologies: Attitudes of Israeli gynecologists[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004, 31(4): 285-286.
[8] G. Noia, M. De Santis, D. Romano, A. F. Cavaliere, M. S. Ligato, A. Petrone, G. Fortunato, F. Filippetti, A. Caruso, S. Mancuso. Complementary therapy for severe Rh-alloimmunization[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002, 29(4): 297-301.
No Suggested Reading articles found!