Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 779-783    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4818.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Comparison of impact on ovarian reserve between laparoscopic and laparotomy ovarian cystectomy
N. Eamudomkarn1, L. Salang1, *(), K. Seejorn1, P. Kleebkaow1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Download:  PDF(315KB)  ( 207 ) Full text   ( 7 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Objective: To compare the effects of laparoscopy and laparotomy in unilateral ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve by measuring serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. Design: Prospective cohort single-blind study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with unilateral benign ovarian cysts were prospectively recruited from March to December 2016. Twenty-six patients underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy and the other 26 underwent laparotomic ovarian cystectomy. Serum samples were obtained from all the study population preoperatively and two months postoperatively for AMH measurement. The number of follicles attached to the removed cyst wall were counted and recorded by a gynecological pathologist. Results: A statistically significant decrease in ovarian reserve at two months postoperatively was found in the laparotomy group when compared to the laparoscopy group. There was no difference in the number of follicles retained in the removed ovarian cyst walls between groups. No major operative complications occurred in either group. Conclusion: Patients undergoing ovarian cystectomy using a laparoscopic approach had better postoperative ovarian preservation when compared to conventional laparotomy.

Key words:  Ovarian cysts      Ovarian cystectomy      Ovarian reserve     
Published:  10 October 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  L. SALANG     E-mail:  slingling@kku.ac.th

Cite this article: 

N. Eamudomkarn, L. Salang, K. Seejorn, P. Kleebkaow. Comparison of impact on ovarian reserve between laparoscopic and laparotomy ovarian cystectomy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 779-783.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4818.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I5/779

[1] Yu Deng, Zhan-Hui Ou, Min-Na Yin, Pei-Ling Liang, Zhi-Heng Chen, Abraham Morse, Ling Sun. Age and anti-Műllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization with diminished ovarian reserve[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 835-841.
[2] Aybike Pekin, Ayşe Gül Kebapçılar, Ersin Çintesun, Setenay Arzu Yılmaz, Özlem Seçilmiş Kerimoğlu. Comparison of an estradiol patch and GnRH-antagonist protocol with a letrozole/antagonist protocol for patients without oocyte development, fertilization and/or embryo development in previous IVF cycles[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 924-928.
[3] Mehmet Serdar Oguz, Tolga Ecemiş, Gülçin T. Sarıyıldız. Conservative management of unilateral and unilocolor ovarian cysts ≥ 10 cm in diameter in postmenopausal women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 410-415.
[4] H. Saleh, F. Moiety, A.F. Agameya, Y. Elkassar, R.M. El Sharakwy, D. Zeidan, H. Elmeligy. Comparison between antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormonal level in the prediction of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients: implications in personalizing ovarian stimulation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 166-173.
[5] Hue HJ, Kim SK, Choi JY, Suh DH, Kim KD, No JH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Kim YB, Jeon HW. Previous ovarian surgery increases the risk of tubal factor infertility[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 84-88.
[6] J. Jeong, J. Yang, Y. J. Song, Y. J. Na, H. G. Kim. A case report of acute ovarian cyst torsion by female adnexal tumor of probable Wölffian origin[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 824-827.
[7] L.-S. Wang, X.-L. Zhao, X.-A. Cai, G.-F. Fu. Age specific reference intervals of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration of 1,253 women with healthy females in infertility center[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 526-530.
[8] A.H. Kaya, E. Tekgunduz, S. Akpınar, G. Bozdağ, T.N. Yiğenoğlu, A. Merdin, S. Namdaroglu, O. Kayıkcı, F. Altuntaş. Assessment of ovarian reserve with anti-Mullerian hormone in women following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 127-130.
[9] J. Micic, L. Surlan, J. Dotlic, N. Milic, S. Vidakovic, N. Radunovic. Ovarian response predictive model in different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF/ICSI treatment[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 923-928.
[10] H.U. Yuvacı, S. Uysal, H. Haltaş, B. Sırav, C.I. Duvan, N. Turhan, N. Seyhan. The effect of non-ionizing radiation on the ovarian reserves of female rats[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 605-610.
[11] A. Eser, D. Hizli, M. Namuslu, H. Haltas, N. Kosus, A. Kosus, H. Kafali. Protective effect of curcumin on ovarian reserve in a rat ischemia model: an experimental study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(3): 453-457.
[12] Wei Wang, Yan-Qing Wang, Ying-Ying Qin, Yu-Jie Dang, Ming-Di Xia, Ying Ma, Yu-Lan Mu. The feasibility of establishing classification system for ovarian function[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(5): 631-637.
[13] B. Vural, Y. Çakıroğlu, F. Vural. The predictor markers of ovarian response in poor responders under 40 years of age[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(5): 650-653.
[14] S. Zervoudis, G. Iatrakis, E. Tomara, A. Bothou, P. Peitsidis G. Mastorakos. Efficiency of GnRH analogues in treating large functional ovarian cysts[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(2): 230-232.
[15] T. Aydin, M. Kara, T. Aran, N. Turktekin, B. Ozdemir. The association between anti-Mullerian hormone and IVF-ICSI outcome in poor responder patients performing long protocol[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015, 42(5): 663-665.
No Suggested Reading articles found!