Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 731-735    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4830.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Smart phone applications for self-monitoring of the menstrual cycle: a review and content analysis
K. Drusany Starič1, *(), V. Trajkovik2, H. Belani3, A. Vitagliano4, P. Bukovec1
1Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, R. Macedonia
3Division of Information Technologies, Ministry of Health, zagreb, Croatia
4Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
Download:  PDF(429KB)  ( 234 ) Full text   ( 6 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Background: In last years, a spread of smart phone applications (apps) for the self-monitoring of individual health has been recorded, especially among young people. A broad number of healthcare apps is designed for women, encouraging the self-responsibility in the surveillance of their menstrual cycle. Aim of the present study was to provide a review and features analysis of the apps for the self-monitoring of the menstrual cycle available on the major official mobile-phone application platforms. Materials and Methods: A systematic search in Google Play Store and iTunes was performed from January to December 2017. The most popular apps for the monitoring of the menstrual cycle were downloaded and their functions and features were evaluated and compared. Results: The authors found a considerable difference between applications in the number of tracking functions. While some apps are more sophisticated and combine almost all possible functions for tracking the menstrual cycle (Clue, Life, and Period Tracker Lite), some others are simpler, and their purpose is merely to record menstrual days, without any precise calculation of the fertile days (Cycles). With iPeriod, the tracking of menstrual cycle and the received drugs can be recorded. Conclusions: All the studied apps are excellent in providing awareness of the menstrual cycle. Some of them record valuable information for the self-monitoring of the menstrual cycle. Which app to be used mainly depends on the data wanted to be gathered from the monitoring. Although most of the devices and apps are excellent in providing direct information to the user, some improvements are still possible. A future challenge will be how data would be gathered through smart phone apps and how could be used in clinical practice.

Key words:  Connected health      Mobile phone      Gynaecology      Menometrorrhagia      Menstrual cycle      Monitoring     
Published:  10 October 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  K. DRUSANY STARIČ     E-mail:

Cite this article: 

K. Drusany Starič, V. Trajkovik, H. Belani, A. Vitagliano, P. Bukovec. Smart phone applications for self-monitoring of the menstrual cycle: a review and content analysis. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 731-735.

URL:     OR

[1] Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman, Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka, Piotr Merks, Małgorzata Mizgier, Witold Kędzia, Maciej Wilczak. Disability vs the sexual life of women - selected issues[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 19-23.
[2] F. Fabbian, A. Coppola, R. Cappadona, A. De Giorgi, S. Fanaro, E. Di Simone, R. Manfredini, P. Greco, M. A. Rodríguez Borrego, P. J. López Soto. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy: an Italian experience[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 89-92.
[3] M. Kawamura, E. Satoi, R. Kiyoku, N. Nozaka, M. Matsuda, R. Kanda, H. Kiseki. Delayed administration method of clomiphene citrate during the ovulatory phase in patients with a prolonged menstrual cycle[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(2): 299-302.
[4] N. Kathopoulis, D. Valsamidis, E. Stamatakis, S. Athanasiou, T. Grigoriadis, A. Protopapas. Deep neuromuscular blockade in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 824-833.
[1] Eli M. Roth, Michael H. Davidson. PCSK9 Inhibitors: Mechanism of Action, Efficacy, and Safety[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 19(S1): 31 -46 .
[2] Sandeep K. Krishnan, Norman E. Lepor. Acute and Chronic Cardiovascular Effects of Hyperkalemia: New Insights Into Prevention and Clinical Management[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2016, 17(S1): 9 -21 .
[3] Ibrahim Sidiqi, Patrick Alexander. Current Advances in Endovascular Therapy for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 16(1): 36 -50 .
[4] Peter Shalit. Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2014, 15(S1): 38 -46 .
[5] Sophie Mavrogeni, Fabrizio Cantini, Gerald M. Pohost. Systemic Vasculitis: An Underestimated Cause of Heart Failure—Assessment by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2013, 14(1): 49 -55 .
[6] George L. Smith. Appropriate Use Criteria: The Gold Standard, or a Mechanism for the Derogation of Clinical Judgment?[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2011, 12(2): 105 .
[7] Prabhjot Singh Nijjar, Anoop Parameswaran, Aman M. Amanullah. Evaluation of Anomalous Aortic Origins of the Coronaries by 64-Slice Cardiac Computed Tomography[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2007, 8(3): 175 -181 .
[8] . SELF-ASSESSMENT POST-TEST[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2006, 7(S2): 51 -52 .
[9] Alice K. Jacobs. Gender Differences in Coronary Revascularization: Does Age Make a Difference?[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 5(1): 68 -70 .
[10] Jeffrey W. Moses, Stephane Carlier, Issam Moussa. Lesion Preparation Prior to Stenting[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 5(S2): 16 -21 .