Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 658-660    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4845.2019
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Two cases of uterine and vaginal malformations
A. Le1, L. Yang2, Z. Wang1, X. Y. Dai1, T. H. Xiao1, R. Zhuo1, R. Yuan2, *(), T. Tulandi3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shenzhen Nanshan Peopleʼs Hospital and The 6th Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
2The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
3McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Download:  PDF(337KB)  ( 245 ) Full text   ( 5 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy for oblique uterine septum and oblique vaginal septum. Case Report: There were one patient with oblique uterine septum and another patient with oblique vaginal septum. Case 1 was a 14-year-old female, who revealed a left unicornuate uterus and right non-communicating rudimentary horn with a cavity. Using a resectoscope with a needle electrode, the authors made a transverse incision on the bulging area of the septum at the level of the tubal ostium. Case 2 was a 14-year-old female with a double vagina, large fluid collection in the occluded right hemivagina, and absent of the right kidney. The authors performed a hysteroscopy, resection of the vaginal septum, and vaginoplasty. Conclusion: Intraoperative ultrasound monitoring can improve surgery safety, with the advantages of lesser amounts of trauma, a good therapeutic effect, fewer complications, less bleeding, quick recovery, and simultaneous protection of the hymen.

Key words:  Oblique uterine septum      OVSS      Hysteroscopy     
Published:  10 August 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  R. YUAN     E-mail:  leaiwen@126.com

Cite this article: 

A. Le, L. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Y. Dai, T. H. Xiao, R. Zhuo, R. Yuan, T. Tulandi. Two cases of uterine and vaginal malformations. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 658-660.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4845.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I4/658

[1] Alessandra Gallo, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Antonietta Legnante, Romolo Di Iorio, Carlo De Angelis. Hysteroscopy in COVID-19 times[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1017-1021.
[2] Maurizio Nicola D'Alterio, Francesco Scicchitano, Daniela Fanni, Gavino Faa, Antonio Simone Laganà, Marco Noventa, Felice Sorrentino, Luigi Nappi, Stefano Angioni. Ex vivo myolysis with dual wavelengths diode laser system: macroscopicand histopathological examination[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 875-882.
[3] Rocio Montejo, Jonas Hermansson, Lena Sandin Wranker, Louise Danielsson. Doula support in office hysteroscopy: results from a pilot study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 955-961.
[4] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[5] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[6] S.J. Liu, W. Lv, M. Shi, B.L. Bi, H.D. Wang. Hysteroscopic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation of myomas: Two case reports and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 991-993.
[7] M. Elmahdy, I. Elfourtia, H. Maghraby. Office hysteroscopy in cases of recurrent implantation failure; Do or not to do[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 723-728.
[8] G. Garuti, E. Castellacci, S. Calabrese, S. Calzolari. Hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception with enhanced vascularity: a study of reliability[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 472-477.
[9] S. B. Cohen, M. Shapira, A. Baron, J. Bouaziz, R. Mashiach, M. Goldenberg, R. Orvieto. Ultrasonography-guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization of proximally occluded tubes - reproductive outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 872-875.
[10] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[11] L. Giannella, K. Mfuta, L. B. Cerami, F. Boselli. Does uterine position affect pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 787-791.
[12] A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.
[13] I. Rudic Biljic-Erski, M. Vasiljevic, S. Rakic, S. Mihajlovic, O. D. Smiljkovic. The impact of hysteroscopic myomectomy on fertility and pregnancy outcomes of infertile women according characteristics of submucous fibroids[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 235-240.
[14] Lin-lin Guan, Hua-li Wang, Lan-zhou Jiao. Treatment of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm by embolization or hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy: two case reports[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 959-962.
[15] J.H. Check, E. Chang. No evidence to support the concept that endometrial polyps impair fertility in the majority of cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(2): 159-162.
No Suggested Reading articles found!