Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (1): 16-20    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4196.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Perinatal outcome of prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes near the limit of fetal viability
S. Obata1, *(), S. Aoki1, K. Sakamaki2, K. Seki1, F. Hirahara3
1 Perinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
2 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine and University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
Download:  PDF(379KB)  ( 233 ) Full text   ( 7 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of investigation: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the perinatal outcome of expectant management for prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) near the limit of fetal viability. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women who delivered babies between January 2000 and March 2015 and had a history of PPROM at 22–23 weeks of gestation with a latency of one week or longer were included in the PPROM cohort. The control cohort included women who delivered babies within 24 hours after PPROM during the same period. Perinatal outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results: No differences were observed between the two cohorts in terms of survival to discharge from the NICU (p = 0.43) and respiratory complication at one year of corrected age (p = 1.00). Conclusions: Prolonged PPROM did not affect the rate of survival discharge from NICU and respiratory complication at one year of corrected age.
Key words:  Premature rupture of membranes      Expectant management      Perinatal outcome      Fetal viability      Respiratory complication     
Published:  10 February 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  S. OBATA     E-mail:  soobata@yokohama-cu.ac.jp

Cite this article: 

S. Obata, S. Aoki, K. Sakamaki, K. Seki, F. Hirahara. Perinatal outcome of prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes near the limit of fetal viability. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 16-20.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4196.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I1/16

[1] Anna M. Rubinshtein, Oleg V. Golyanovskiy. Obstetric outcomes in women of advanced maternal age after assisted reproduction[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 893-900.
[2] C. Ji, L.J. Sun, L.T. Li, J. Ma, W.H. Ge, X. Zhao. Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on blood glucose control and perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus through a diabetes management system[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 645-652.
[3] D. Lu, X. Bao, Q. Wang. Increasd mRNA expression of TRAF-6 and MST-4 in the placenta of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes with histological chorioamnionitis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 749-754.
[4] J. W. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. H. Moon, H. A. Jung, E. J. Noh. The efficacy of third-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole versus third-generation cephalosporin plus clarithromycin in neonatal outcomes and oxidative stress markers in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 194-198.
[5] S. Y. Jung, S. J. Chon, R. S. Lee, E. Y. Woo, J. S. Lee, S. Y. Kim. Difference in pregnancy outcomes between primiparous and multiparous women older than 40 years[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 243-247.
[6] E. J. Shim, H. J. Kim, I. Y. Kim, K. Y. Oh, Y. S. Yang, C. H. Jin. Outcomes of prophylactic and emergency cerclage versus expectant management for cervical insufficiency: a single-center retrospective, comparative study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 262-267.
[7] R. Dias Nunes, E. Traebert, M. Seemann, J. Traebert. Evaluation of simple and low-cost diagnostic tests for premature rupture of membranes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 287-290.
[8] N. Al-Husban, O. Al-Kuran, M. Khadra, K. Fram. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy; prevalence, causes and fetomaternal outcome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 21-26.
[9] F. Thekrallah, A. Alnadi, A. Almajalii, N. Muhaidat, A. Al-qatawneh, E. F. Badran. Obstetrics and perinatal outcome of grand multiparity in Jordan: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 250-257.
[10] M.S. Beksac, N.K. Ertürk, A.T. Beksac, G. Örgül, H.T. Celik, M. Yurdakök, T. Yildirim, A. Dolgun. Primary glomerular diseases and pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 682-686.
[11] N. Peker, A. Demir, C. Aydın, A. Biler, S. Gundogan. Adolescent pregnancies and perinatal outcomes: a study at tertiary hospital at the eastern part of Turkey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 339-343.
[12] K. Roloff, A. Gray, V.J. Guillermo. Repeat cesarean delivery in the 39-week rule era: outcomes at a community based hospital[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 391-395.
[13] C. Danielsson, M. Dahmoun, M. Bolin, J. Agrell, S. Turkmen. Management and outcomes of preterm premature rupture of the membranes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 419-424.
[14] E. Cakar, N. Tarhan, H.A. Taşan, D. Karcaaltincaba, M.B. Sentürk, Ç.A. Yayla, A.A. Ertekin. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of borderline hyperglycemia during pregnancy diagnosed with abnormal screening test[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 882-887.
[15] H. Alchalabi, Y.S. Khader, I. Lataifeh, B. Obeidat, F. Zayed, W. Khriesat, N. Obeidat. Morbidly adherent placenta previa: clinical course and risk from emergency delivery in a series of 26 women that underwent hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 524-527.
No Suggested Reading articles found!