Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2018, Vol. 45 Issue (4): 632-635    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4251.2018
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Pregnancy in the scar after myomectomy
J. Hudecová 1, *(), A. Hudec2, Z. Novotný 1, D. Slouka3
1 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2 Genetika Ltd., Pilsen, Czech Republic
3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
A 33-year-old female after the laparoscopic myomectomy in 2013 was hospitalized for suspected pregnancy in the scar after myomectomy in the 12th week of pregnancy. After admission to the hospital, an ultrasound examination and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis. Due to the finding, the patient was prescribed surgical intervention. The laparoscopy was performed and due to the interoperating performance, it was converted to laparotomy with evacuation of fetal eggs, by excision of the edges of the myometrium, and the suture of the wall of the uterine. The operation was complicated by excessive blood loss and coagulation disorder, which was dealt with in cooperation with an anesthesiologist. The postoperative period was without complications and the patient was released to home care on 7th postoperative day.
Key words:  Pregnancy in the scar after myomectomy      Ultrasound      Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy      MRI      Tachosil     
Published:  10 August 2018     
*Corresponding Author(s):  J. HUDECOVÁ     E-mail:  landsmanovaj@fnplzen.cz

Cite this article: 

J. Hudecová, A. Hudec, Z. Novotný, D. Slouka. Pregnancy in the scar after myomectomy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 632-635.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4251.2018     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2018/V45/I4/632

[1] Christina M. Moisidis-Tesch, Nicole Vedder, Norman A. Ginsberg. Rapid rate of growth in adnexal masses, despite benign appearance on ultrasound, was associated with malignancy. A retrospective analysis of 48 consecutive cases from a single institution[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1081-1088.
[2] Ryuichi Shimaoka, Tomomi Shiga, Ken-ichirou Morishige. Effect of ritodrine tocolysis on fetal cardiac output distribution to the placenta[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1126-1131.
[3] Mahmoud Alalfy, Soha Talaat Hamed, Alaa Sobhi Abd El Ghani, Ahmed Elgazzar, Amr Abbassy, Ahmed S. S. A. Rashwan, Omar Nagy, Mohamed A Shalaby, Hatem Hassan, Asmaa Ibrahem, Hesham Kamal, Reham Mahrous, Eman Kamal. The accuracy of 3D-TUI and 3D power Doppler using Alalfy simple criteria in the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1132-1140.
[4] Ji-Chen Wang, De-Ying Wei, Chen Su, Qi Han, Yong-Hao Gai. Intraoperative management of a Robert's uterus without hematometra in blind hemi-cavity preoperatively misdiagnosed as septate uterus[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1219-1223.
[5] Maria Aparecida Mazzutti Verlangieri Carmo, Helmer Herren, Francisco J. C. Dos-Reis, Fabricio Da Silva Costa, Julio C. Rosa-e-Silva, Antonio Alberto Nogueira, Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto. Reliability and agreement of three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with chronic pelvic pain[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 494-499.
[6] Lejla Kamerić, Anis Cerovac, Mirzeta Rizvanović, Alen Kamerić, Mahira Jahić, Dubravko Habek. Frequency of cesarean section in pregnant women with risk factors for preeclampsia: prospective cohort study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 561-566.
[7] Özgür Koçak, Cem Koçak. Finding the best formulas to estimate fetal weight based on ultrasound for the Turkish population: a comparison of 24 formulas[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 676-685.
[8] Angel Yordanov, Krasimira Zhelyaskova. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal scrotal inguinal hernia: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 723-727.
[9] Ryuichi Shimaoka, Tomomi Shiga, Ken-ichirou Morishige. Change in uterine artery blood flow with intrauterine balloon tamponade[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 307-311.
[10] Jun Wang, Xiao-Dong Zhao, Gang Wang, Wei-Ming Li, Hua Guo, Jia-Mei Gou, Guo-Juan Feng, Jing Rao. The accuracy of pulmonary ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of community-acquired pneumonia in women of childbearing age[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 381-388.
[11] Rui-Ke Liu, Li Li, Xue-Qian Du, Ying Wang, Shuai Chen, Gui-Lian Li, Gui-Fang Li. Gestational age affects the cerebellum development in neonatal infants: establishment of cerebellar extrauterine reference values as a function of gestational age[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 395-401.
[12] Suchaya Luewan, Pakorn Chaksuwat, Tip Pongsuvareeyakul, Theera Tongsong. Prenatal sonographic findings and management of placental mesenchymal dysplasia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 439-443.
[13] Duygu Adıyaman, Bahar Konuralp Atakul, Melda Kuyucu, Hakan Gölbasi, Atalay Ekin. Difference between near-field and far-field of middle cerebral artery doppler pulsatility index and peak systolic velocity: a prospective study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 66-72.
[14] Shuhao Deng, Yicheng Zhu, Quan Jiang, Yuan Zhang. Evaluation of four-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of female pelvic floor dysfunction and prognosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 950-954.
[15] C. Stenfelt, L. Ydenius, S. Lindberg, J. Spira, G. Edelstam. Effects of the colour and design of a new pelvic examination chair on comfort during gynaecological examination[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 556-559.
No Suggested Reading articles found!