Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2018, Vol. 45 Issue (2): 287-289    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3846.2018
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
A case of uterine torsion in term pregnancy associated with placental abruption and intrauterine fetal demise
Z. Protrka1, P. Arsenijevic1, *(), N. Jovic1, S. Zivanovic2, J. Djuric1, A. Dimitrijevic1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
2 Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Uterine torsion is defined as rotation of the uterus of more than 45° on its long axis. It is an unusual complication of pregnancy and probably represents a once-in-a-lifetime diagnosis. Fetal mortality up to 12 % and occasional maternal mortality are reported. The authors report a case of 180 degrees dextrogyre torsion at 38 weeks of gestation complicated by placental abruption with resultant maternal hypovolemic shock and intrauterine fetal demise. Emergency cesarean section was performed. After exteriorization of the uterus the authors observed the anterior crossing over of the proper ovarian ligaments, and at that time they realised that the uterus was axially rotated by 180 degrees. They performed a counterclockwise detorsion of the uterus and confirmed a low transverse incision of the posterior wall of the organ. Intraoperative plication of the uterosacral ligaments should be performed for prevention of recurrent torsion.
Key words:  Uterine torsion      Pregnancy      Cesarean section     
Published:  10 April 2018     
*Corresponding Author(s):  P. ARSENIJEVIC     E-mail:  petar.arsenijevic@yahoo.com

Cite this article: 

Z. Protrka, P. Arsenijevic, N. Jovic, S. Zivanovic, J. Djuric, A. Dimitrijevic. A case of uterine torsion in term pregnancy associated with placental abruption and intrauterine fetal demise. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(2): 287-289.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3846.2018     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2018/V45/I2/287

[1] Amanda M. Wang, Alan J. Lee, Shannon M. Clark. The effects of overweight and obesity on pregnancy-related morbidity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 999-1009.
[2] Leen Van den Eeden, Greet Leysens,Dominique Mannaerts, Yves Jacquemyn. Air pollution: cardiovascular and other negative effects on pregnancy: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1010-1016.
[3] Xin Du, Qian Zou, Yu-Lan Liu. Transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by uterine artery pre-ligation: a report of 4 cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1044-1047.
[4] Athanasia Tsaroucha, Aliki Tympa Grigoriadou, Tania Moshovou, Kassiani Theodoraki, Aikaterini Melemeni. Efficacy of intrathecally administered fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a double blinded, randomized clinical trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1065-1070.
[5] Marcelo Epsztein Kanczuk, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Alison Pighills, Antony Ji, Casey Steele, Daniel Bartlett. The time to perform spinal or general anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients requiring emergency caesarean delivery: a prospective crossover simulation study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1099-1106.
[6] Noor Hazim Abdulkareem, Elham Hazeim Abdulkareem. SARS-CoV-2 detection in pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1141-1145.
[7] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[8] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[9] Min Jung Kim, Hee-Sook Lim, Hae-Hyeog Lee, Tae-Hee Kim, Yongsoon Park. Dietary assessment, nutrition knowledge, and pregnancy outcome in high-risk pregnant Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1178-1185.
[10] Neha Sethi, Ann Gee Tan, Maherah Kamarudin, Sofiah Sulaiman. Successful delivery of a twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1232-1247.
[11] Luca Roncati, Greta Gianotti, Elisa Ambrogi, Giovanna Attolini. COVID-19 in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 778-780.
[12] Lorenz Hinterleitner, Herbert Kiss, Johannes Ott. The impact of Cesarean section on female fertility: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 781-786.
[13] Silvia Amodeo, Giulia Bonavina, Anna Seidenari, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Antonio Farina. Real-world implementation and adaptation to local settings of first trimester preeclampsia screening in Italy: a systematic review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 812-819.
[14] Yu Deng, Zhan-Hui Ou, Min-Na Yin, Pei-Ling Liang, Zhi-Heng Chen, Abraham Morse, Ling Sun. Age and anti-Műllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization with diminished ovarian reserve[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 835-841.
[15] Serdar Balci. The effect of ultraviolet index measurements on levels of vitamin D andinflammatory markers in pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 888-892.
No Suggested Reading articles found!