Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 787-791    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4841.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Does uterine position affect pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy?
L. Giannella1, *(), K. Mfuta1, L. B. Cerami1, F. Boselli2
1Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Cesare Magati Hospital, Scandiano, Italy
2Mother-Infant Department, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Download:  PDF(356KB)  ( 204 ) Full text   ( 5 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Objective: To assess the impact of uterine position on pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from 312 diagnostic hysteroscopy patients were evaluated. Pain was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Analyses were performed to determine associations between uterine position [anteverted-anteflexed (AA), anteverted-retroflexed (AR), retroverted-anteflexed (RA), retroverted-retroflexed (RR)], and pain intensity during the procedure (VAS > 3 vs. VAS ≤ 3). Patient characteristics and clinical variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed no association between uterine position and pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy [AA uterus, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.82, confidence interval (CI): 0.39-1.72; AR uterus, AOR = 0.65, CI: 0.25-1.71; RA uterus, AOR = 1.37, CI: 0.38- 4.84; RR uterus, AOR = 0.84, CI: 0.22-3.17]. Conclusion: The present data suggest that uterine position does not affect pain intensity during diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Key words:  Uterine position      Hysteroscopy      Pain      Version angle      Flexion angle     
Published:  10 October 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  L. GIANNELLA     E-mail:  lucazeta1976@libero.it

Cite this article: 

L. Giannella, K. Mfuta, L. B. Cerami, F. Boselli. Does uterine position affect pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy?. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 787-791.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4841.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I5/787

[1] Alessandra Gallo, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Antonietta Legnante, Romolo Di Iorio, Carlo De Angelis. Hysteroscopy in COVID-19 times[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1017-1021.
[2] Aliki Tympa, Charalampos Grigoriadis. The Hassiakos maneuver: how to test neuraxial anesthesia before Cesarean section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1061-1064.
[3] Anjeza Xholli, Anna Biasioli, Giovanni Grandi, Angelo Cagnacci. Dienogest-based hormonal contraception induced changes in the ultrasound presentation of the uterus and menstrual pain[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1186-1192.
[4] Sonia Sánchez, Laura Baquedano, Nicolás Mendoza. Treatment of vulvar pain caused by atrophy: a systematic review of clinical studies[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 800-805.
[5] Maurizio Nicola D'Alterio, Francesco Scicchitano, Daniela Fanni, Gavino Faa, Antonio Simone Laganà, Marco Noventa, Felice Sorrentino, Luigi Nappi, Stefano Angioni. Ex vivo myolysis with dual wavelengths diode laser system: macroscopicand histopathological examination[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 875-882.
[6] Rocio Montejo, Jonas Hermansson, Lena Sandin Wranker, Louise Danielsson. Doula support in office hysteroscopy: results from a pilot study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 955-961.
[7] Dragan Belci, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Davor Zoričić, Andrea Tinelli, Antonio Malvasi, Michael Stark. Less is more—a minimal approach technique for Cesarean Section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 478-482.
[8] Maria Aparecida Mazzutti Verlangieri Carmo, Helmer Herren, Francisco J. C. Dos-Reis, Fabricio Da Silva Costa, Julio C. Rosa-e-Silva, Antonio Alberto Nogueira, Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto. Reliability and agreement of three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with chronic pelvic pain[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 494-499.
[9] Eser Ağar, Gökhan Karakoç. Comparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 534-539.
[10] Jerilee Mariam Khong Azhary, Aizura Syafinaz Adlan, Sivakumar S. Balakrishnan, Siti Rohayu Kamarul Baharain, Syeda Nureena Syed Jafer Hussain Zaidi, Nuguelis Razali, Mukhri Hamdan, Noor Azmi Mat Adenan, Siti Zawiah Omar. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for post-operative pain following laparoscopic tubal ligation: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 654-660.
[11] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[12] Ayşe Gül Kabakcı, Memduha Gülhal Bozkır. Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma treatment in perineal trauma: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 728-732.
[13] Moon Kyoung Cho, Tae Young Kim, Chul Hong Kim. Colouterine fistula secondary to pyometra: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 431-433.
[14] Narges Momenyan, Ali Asghar Safaei, Sedighe Hantoushzadeh. Immersive virtual reality analgesia in un-medicated laboring women (during stage 1 and 2): a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 110-116.
[15] Eman A. Elhosary, Mahmoud M. Ewidea, Marwa A. Mohamed. Efficacy of kinesio tape on neck pain and functional disability in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 175-178.
No Suggested Reading articles found!