Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 630-634    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4764.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Long-term effect of first childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function: cross-sectional study
I. Pimentel-Soares1, *(), A. C. Sartorato Beleza1, M. da Silva Corrêa1, M. Vieira Batistão1, P. Driusso1
1Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
Download:  PDF(242KB)  ( 210 ) Full text   ( 7 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) function of nulliparous and primiparous women with history of vaginal delivery and cesarean section. This study took place at the Women’s Health Research Laboratory, in the Department of Physical Therapy at Federal University of S?o Carlos, Brazil. Sixty volunteers were included between 18 and 40 years-old; regarding the primiparous, the assessment was done strictly from one to three years postpartum. A sample of 20 participants in each group was determined: vaginal delivery group, cesarean group and nulliparous group. Procedures included vaginal palpation, vaginal manometry and surface electromyography of the PFM. Non-parametric variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney test and parametric variables using One-way ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was adopted. No significant difference was found between groups in relation to the function of the PFM evaluated by digital palpation (p = 0.75), vaginal manometry (p = 0.25) and surface electromyography (p = 0.465). The function of the PFM was similar between primiparous and nulliparous.

Key words:  Primiparous      Delivery      Pelvic floor muscle function      Electromyography      Vaginal manometry     
Published:  10 August 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  I. PIMENTEL-SOARES     E-mail:  pimentel_sc@yahoo.com.br

Cite this article: 

I. Pimentel-Soares, A. C. Sartorato Beleza, M. da Silva Corrêa, M. Vieira Batistão, P. Driusso. Long-term effect of first childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function: cross-sectional study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 630-634.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4764.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I4/630

[1] Marcelo Epsztein Kanczuk, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Alison Pighills, Antony Ji, Casey Steele, Daniel Bartlett. The time to perform spinal or general anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients requiring emergency caesarean delivery: a prospective crossover simulation study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1099-1106.
[2] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[3] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[4] Neža Sofija Pristov, Ela Rednak, Ksenija Geršak, Andreja Trojner Bregar, Miha Lučovnik. Changes in uterine electromyography according to cervical dilatation in the first stage of labor[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 883-887.
[5] Valeria Filippi, Luigi Raio, Sophia Amylidi-Mohr, Rudolf Tschudi, Daniele Bolla. Epidural analgesia at trial of labour after caesarean section. A retrospective cohort study over 12 years[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 913-917.
[6] Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad Adlan, Vikneswaran Virasamy, Doris Ng Sin-Wen, Noor Azmi Mat Adenan. 8 am versus 8 pm labour induction with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in term pregnancies with unfavourable cervices—a randomised controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 523-527.
[7] Batool Ali H. Alkhazal, Majed Abdullah Halawani, Ibtihal Omar Alsahabi, Hassan S.O. Abduljabbar. The preferred mode of delivery among primigravida Middle Eastern Women. A questionnaire based study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 567-571.
[8] Faris Mujezinović, Veronika Anzeljc, Monika Sobočan, Iztok Takač. Do women in Slovenia prefer vaginal birth after prior caesarean and what hinders its successful outcome? A single institution retrospective analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 607-614.
[9] Antonio Coviello, Concetta Posillipo, Ludovica Golino, Carlo De Angelis, Elisabetta Gragnano, Gabriele Saccone, Marilena Ianniello, Gaetano Castellano, Annachiara Marra, Alfredo Maresca, Maria Vargas, Giuseppe Servillo. Anesthesiologic management of pregnant women with SARS-COV-2 infection undergoing cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 628-630.
[10] Ugo Indraccolo, Maria Giulia Lombana Marino, Beatrice Bianchi, Silvia Catagini, Danila Morano, Pantaleo Greco. Symphysis-fundal height correlates with adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes in induced full-term and premature pregnancies[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 637-641.
[11] Bara'a Samara, Anton R. Sabella. The knowledge and attitudes of Palestinian women towards different childbirth delivery options[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 138-143.
[12] B. Kim, S.H. Hong, J.H. Kim, M.Y. Kang, M.R. Rhee, J. Kim, K.J. Kim, H.A. Lee. Giant ventral hernia immediately after vaginal twin delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 988-990.
[13] S. Srisukho, K. Srisupundit, T. Tongsong. Fulfillment of the criteria for diagnosis of cephalo-pelvic disproportion: ACOG guidelines[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 500-504.
[14] N. Dropińska, K. Chmaj-Wierzchowska, M. Wojciechowska, M. Wilczak. What is the state of knowledge on preterm birth?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 505-510.
[15] G. Sel, A. Barut, Ü. Özmen, A. Y. Akdemir, S. Harma, B. Aynalı, M. Harma, M.İ. Harma. Mode of delivery does not have a relationship with high-risk HPV positivity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 541-545.
No Suggested Reading articles found!