Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 575-577    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4673.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Uterine manipulator - low budget option
M. Simonsen1, *(), L. Martins Campbell2, R. Moretti Marques3
1Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual de São Paulo - São Paulo, Brazil
2ICB - Instituto de Colposcopia e Ginecologia Oncológica de Brasilia - Brasilia, Brazil
3Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - São Paulo, Brazil
Download:  PDF(625KB)  ( 190 ) Full text   ( 8 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

In these reports the authors describe one simple option to build a uterine manipulator with disposable materials used commonly in medical practice: a foley cateter, a 60 cc syringe, and a hysterometer. They believe this manipulator safely fulfills the role of uterine exposure in laparoscopic surgery with low cost.

Key words:  Laparoscopy      Hysterectomy      Uterine manipulator     
Published:  10 August 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  M. SIMONSEN     E-mail:  drmarcelosimonsen@gmail.com

Cite this article: 

M. Simonsen, L. Martins Campbell, R. Moretti Marques. Uterine manipulator - low budget option. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 575-577.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4673.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I4/575

[1] Cengiz Andan, Serif Aksin, Mehmet Rifat Goklu, Seyhmus Tunc. Factors related to blood loss in laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1075-1080.
[2] Ranit Hizkiyahu, Shannon Salvador, Michael H. Dahan. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in a woman with borderline serous ovarian tumor causing a large fluctuating subcutaneous fluid collection: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1215-1218.
[3] Üzeyir Kalkan, Murat Yassa, Kadir Bakay, Şafak Hatırnaz. Mechanical bowel preparation prior to gynaecological laparoscopy enables better operative field visualization, lower pneumoperitoneum pressure and Trendelenburg angle during the surgery: a perspective that may add to patient safety[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 842-850.
[4] Basilio Pecorino, Giuseppe Scibilia, Placido Borzì, Maria Elena Vento, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Paolo Scollo. Diminished ovarian reserve and ectopic ovaries in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome candidates for Uterus Transplantation: our experience[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 907-912.
[5] Eren Akbaba. Can high transverse skin incision (Modified Maylard) be a new alternative in placenta accreta spectrum management with cesarean hysterectomy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 686-690.
[6] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[7] Yuki Yoshimura, Kentaro Nakayama, Kiyoka Sawada, Hitomi Yamashita, Kohei Nakamura, Tomoka Ishibashi, Masako Ishikawa, Sultana Razia, Seiya Sato, Satoru Kyo. A case of rectal injury due to vaginal pipe misinsertion during total laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 194-197.
[8] X.R. Wang, Y.F. Wang, S.W. Kang, Y. Zhang. Treatment outcomes of uterine lesion resection versus hysterectomy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 882-886.
[9] O. Sevket, T. Takmaz, A.C. Sevket, A. Toprak, P. Ozcan. Vaginal assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with anterior colpotomy (VALSAC): technique and mean 20 months outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 887-894.
[10] J.L. Liu, J.M. Chen, Y.F. Zheng, X.W. Zhang, R.X. Shi. 5 mm mini-incision laparoendoscopic single-site surgery of total hysterectomy: a report of five cases and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 895-899.
[11] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[12] M.S. Kim, E.D. Na, H.C. Kim, M. Kim, S.Y. Shin, M.H. Lee. Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn with multiple leiomyomas in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 968-971.
[13] Ö. Koşar Can, Ö.T. Güler, Ü. Çabuş, D. Kılıç, C. Kabukçu. Evaluation of sexual functions and quality of life in female patients after hysterectomy for benign symptomatic diseases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 693-700.
[14] E.D. Na, S.H. Choi, H. Park. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for concurrent hysterectomy and cholecystectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 792-796.
[15] P. Phangsuwan, P. Suprasert. Development of abnormal bowel function after simple hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 744-748.
No Suggested Reading articles found!