Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (5): 767-771    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3642.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Investigation of the relationship between fear of childbirth and social supports of pregnant women in the third trimester in Turkey
S. Ertekin Pinar1, *(), O. Duran Aksoy1, B. Cesur1, D. Bilgic1, G. Daglar1, E. Guler2
1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
2 Faculty of Nursing, 9 Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
3 Private Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between fear of childbirth and social supports of pregnant women in the third trimester. Materials and Methods: The sample of this cross-sectional study comprised 302 pregnant women who were admitted to the gynecology and obstetrics clinic of a state hospital in Turkey. Data were collected with the Personal Information Form, Wijma Delivery Expect ancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ-A), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Results: While no relationship was determined between the mean total scores obtained from the W-DEQ-A and MSPSS scales (p > 0.05), statistically significant positive correlations were determined between family and friends (r = 0.206, p = 0.000), family, and significant others (r = 0.193, p = 0.001), and friends and significant others (r = 0.156, p = 0.006) subscales of the MSPSS (p < 0.05). Conclusion: As the social support received from the family increased so did the support from friends and significant others, and as the support received from significant others increased so did the support from friends.
Key words:  Fear of childbirth      Mental health      Pregnancy      Social support     
Published:  10 October 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  S. ERTEKİN PINAR     E-mail:  sepinar09@gmail.com

Cite this article: 

S. Ertekin Pinar, O. Duran Aksoy, B. Cesur, D. Bilgic, G. Daglar, E. Guler. Investigation of the relationship between fear of childbirth and social supports of pregnant women in the third trimester in Turkey. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(5): 767-771.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3642.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I5/767

[1] Amanda M. Wang, Alan J. Lee, Shannon M. Clark. The effects of overweight and obesity on pregnancy-related morbidity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 999-1009.
[2] Leen Van den Eeden, Greet Leysens,Dominique Mannaerts, Yves Jacquemyn. Air pollution: cardiovascular and other negative effects on pregnancy: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1010-1016.
[3] Xin Du, Qian Zou, Yu-Lan Liu. Transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by uterine artery pre-ligation: a report of 4 cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1044-1047.
[4] Marcelo Epsztein Kanczuk, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Alison Pighills, Antony Ji, Casey Steele, Daniel Bartlett. The time to perform spinal or general anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients requiring emergency caesarean delivery: a prospective crossover simulation study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1099-1106.
[5] Noor Hazim Abdulkareem, Elham Hazeim Abdulkareem. SARS-CoV-2 detection in pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1141-1145.
[6] Min Jung Kim, Hee-Sook Lim, Hae-Hyeog Lee, Tae-Hee Kim, Yongsoon Park. Dietary assessment, nutrition knowledge, and pregnancy outcome in high-risk pregnant Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1178-1185.
[7] Neha Sethi, Ann Gee Tan, Maherah Kamarudin, Sofiah Sulaiman. Successful delivery of a twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1232-1247.
[8] Luca Roncati, Greta Gianotti, Elisa Ambrogi, Giovanna Attolini. COVID-19 in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 778-780.
[9] Silvia Amodeo, Giulia Bonavina, Anna Seidenari, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Antonio Farina. Real-world implementation and adaptation to local settings of first trimester preeclampsia screening in Italy: a systematic review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 812-819.
[10] Yu Deng, Zhan-Hui Ou, Min-Na Yin, Pei-Ling Liang, Zhi-Heng Chen, Abraham Morse, Ling Sun. Age and anti-Műllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization with diminished ovarian reserve[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 835-841.
[11] Serdar Balci. The effect of ultraviolet index measurements on levels of vitamin D andinflammatory markers in pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 888-892.
[12] Anna M. Rubinshtein, Oleg V. Golyanovskiy. Obstetric outcomes in women of advanced maternal age after assisted reproduction[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 893-900.
[13] Qian Hu, Mohammed Sharooq Paramboor, Tao Guo. Diagnosis and management of intramural ectopic pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 974-979.
[14] Ovadya Rosenbluh, Asnat Walfisch. Birth defects associated with obesity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 472-477.
[15] Sara Oday, Maysoon Sharief. The role of salivary progesterone and cervical length measurement in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 509-513.
No Suggested Reading articles found!