Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2021, Vol. 48 Issue (5): 1215-1218    DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4805193
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in a woman with borderline serous ovarian tumor causing a large fluctuating subcutaneous fluid collection: a case report
Ranit Hizkiyahu1, Shannon Salvador2, Michael H. Dahan1, *()
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2L 4S8, Canada
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
Download:  PDF(744KB)  ( 57 ) Full text   ( 8 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Background: Fertility preservation in oncologic cases has increased exponentially during the last 15 years. Most of these cases occur in women with breast cancer or lymphoma. Rarely, the onco-fertility physician will have cases of young ovarian cancer patients who wish to cryopreserve their oocytes or embryos. Case: A previously un-described presentation of a borderline serous ovarian tumor in a woman undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. On the day of egg retrieval, a large subcutaneous fluid collection was noted. This fluid collection is possibly secondary to laparoscopic resection of the ovarian mass. Although, cancer recurrence has been noted at laparoscopic port entry sites and ovarian stimulation has been hypothesized to increase the risk of advancement of ovarian cancer cells, this is the first time in the medical literature that a supra-facial fluid collection occurred during gonadotropin stimulation, without ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, in the context of ovarian malignancy. Our hypothesis is that during an operation before the stimulation cycle started, low malignant potential ovarian cells spread via the laparoscopy port to the subcutaneous space and grew in response to the gonadotropin stimulation. Conclusions: Being a borderline tumor, the fluid collection was self limited and did not re-occur with subsequent stimulations. However, in cases of frank ovarian malignacy and ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation cancer metastacis could occur to the sub-cutaneous space.
Key words:  Fertility preservation      Ovarian tumor      Ovarian stimulation      Fluid collection      Laparoscopy     
Submitted:  09 February 2021      Revised:  06 May 2021      Accepted:  17 May 2021      Published:  15 October 2021     
*Corresponding Author(s):  Michael H. Dahan     E-mail:  dahanhaim@hotmail.com

Cite this article: 

Ranit Hizkiyahu, Shannon Salvador, Michael H. Dahan. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in a woman with borderline serous ovarian tumor causing a large fluctuating subcutaneous fluid collection: a case report. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1215-1218.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ceog4805193     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2021/V48/I5/1215

[1] Üzeyir Kalkan, Murat Yassa, Kadir Bakay, Şafak Hatırnaz. Mechanical bowel preparation prior to gynaecological laparoscopy enables better operative field visualization, lower pneumoperitoneum pressure and Trendelenburg angle during the surgery: a perspective that may add to patient safety[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 842-850.
[2] Basilio Pecorino, Giuseppe Scibilia, Placido Borzì, Maria Elena Vento, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Paolo Scollo. Diminished ovarian reserve and ectopic ovaries in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome candidates for Uterus Transplantation: our experience[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 907-912.
[3] Laura Joigneau, Yolanda Ruiz, Coral Bravo, Julia Bujan, Miguel A Ortega, Juan De León-Luis. The brainstem-tentorium angle revisited. Difficulties encountered and possible solutions[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 991-994.
[4] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[5] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[6] M.S. Kim, E.D. Na, H.C. Kim, M. Kim, S.Y. Shin, M.H. Lee. Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn with multiple leiomyomas in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 968-971.
[7] G. Zhu, S.J. Liu, W. Lv. Bilateral borderline ovarian cystadenoma with migration of intrauterine device to right ovary accompanied with endometrial carcinoma in situ: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 781-784.
[8] H. Saleh, F. Moiety, A.F. Agameya, Y. Elkassar, R.M. El Sharakwy, D. Zeidan, H. Elmeligy. Comparison between antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormonal level in the prediction of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients: implications in personalizing ovarian stimulation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 166-173.
[9] F. Sorrentino, F. Boncristiano, F. Greco, A. D’Aloia, P. Di Gioia, L. Nappi. Primary borderline paraovarian serous tumor in pregnancy: case report and review of the literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 139-141.
[10] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[11] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[12] E. Oki, Y. Hashiguchi, M. Yamauchi, M. Kasai, T. Fukuda, T. Ichimura, T. Yasui, T. Sumi. Ovarian actinomycosis mimicking ovarian malignant tumor with no history of intra-uterine device: a rare case[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1011-1013.
[13] R. T. Ratner, A. Harris, J. Tsaltas, N. Goyal, M. Davies-Tuck, H. Najjar, O. Barel. An eight-year retrospective analysis of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, outcomes and complications in a large multicenter unit[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 699-703.
[14] P. Bakas, M. Simopoulou, P. Panagopoulos, N. Salakos, Ch. Siristatidis. Luteal phase progesterone and estradiol concentrations and their relation to the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles with controlled ovarian stimulation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 727-730.
[15] A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.
No Suggested Reading articles found!