|
|
|
Gestational age estimation from ultrasound fetal biometrics in China |
J.F. Sun1, L.J. Zhang1, L.Q. Cui2, X.D. Luo3, G.H. He4, X.J. Dong3, L. He2, J.H. Zhang5, J.H. Sun6, G. Chen1, Y. Lv7, L.Y. Liu1, *( ) |
1Chongqing Key Laboratory of Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Smart Materials, College of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China 2Department of ultrasound, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China 4College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing, P.R. China 5Health Management Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China 7Chongqing Pepper Technology Co., Ltd. Chongqing, P.R. China |
|
|
Abstract
Objective: To establish a new gestational age estimation equation in China and compare them with commonly used equations of 2017 and 1984. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in 3208 fetuses between 15 and 40 weeks of gestation. The following biometric variables were recorded: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length. Women with a certain gestational age were confirmed by the last menstrual period with a regular cycle of 26–32 days. Subsequently, a mixed regression model was used for regression analysis for the estimation equation of gestational age. Additionally, validation set was used to verify the accuracy of the equation. Estimation error was defined as the mean square deviation between the estimation equation and observed gestational age and its accuracy was compared with that analyzed by Hadlock and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) equations. Results: The gestational age estimation errors of the new equation are within 9.62 days from 15 to 20 weeks, 7.90 days from 21 to 25 weeks, 11.76 days from 26 to 30 weeks, 9.35 days from 31 to 35 weeks, and within 11.30 days from 36 to 40 weeks of gestation. Compared to the results evaluated by the Hadlock and NICHD equations, the estimation of the new equation has significantly improved gestational age determination in the second and third trimesters. Conclusions: The estimation results of the new equation is superior to those of the Hadlock and NICHD equations and provides more accurate results for gestational age estimation with ultrasonic examination.
|
Submitted: 30 August 2019
Accepted: 18 March 2020
Published: 15 October 2020
|
Fund: 11974066/National Natural Science Foundation of China 11674043/National Natural Science Foundation of China cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0477/Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2018jcyjA3679/Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing 2019CDYGYB007/Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities |
*Corresponding Author(s):
LIYU LIU
E-mail: lyliu@cqu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
J.F. Sun, L.J. Zhang, L.Q. Cui, X.D. Luo, G.H. He, X.J. Dong, L. He, J.H. Zhang, J.H. Sun, G. Chen, Y. Lv, L.Y. Liu. Gestational age estimation from ultrasound fetal biometrics in China. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 714-722.
URL:
https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.05.5360 OR https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2020/V47/I5/714
|
[1] |
Akanksha Agrawal, Deepanshu Jain, Pradhum Ram, Jorge Luis Penalver Leon, Janani Rangaswami. Anticoagulation for intra-cardiac thrombi in peripartum cardiomyopathy: A review of the literature[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2019, 20(2): 53
-58
. |
[2] |
B. Soltész, J. Lukács, A. Penyige, R. Póka, B. Nagy. Determination of miR-193b rs30236 single nucleotide polymorphism in ovarian cancer patients[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2019, 40(4): 547
-550
. |
[3] |
Y. Li, C. Li, N. Li, L. Jiang, W. Yang, Y. Wang, B. Wu, C. Shi, Z. Zhu. RNAi silenced NUP88 gene suppresses growth and invasiveness of human breast cancer cell line MCF-7[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2019, 40(4): 634
-639
. |
[4] |
Wang Xiaoyin, Zhao Qingping, Yan Mei, Yi HongYing. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical ectopic decidua during pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(3): 428
-432
. |
[5] |
Sung Taek Park, Hye-yon Cho, Sung-ho Park. Clinical comparison of minimal invasive hysterectomy techniques: laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 503
-507
. |
[6] |
E.S. Yılmaz, T. Sapmaz, H. Kazgan, S. Menziletoglu Yıldız, D. Kocamaz, N. Akpolat, E. Sapmaz. Examination of the effect of melatonin use before hysterosalpingography on ovarian follicle reserve in rats[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 570
-574
. |
[7] |
Tao Cui, Yiqi Zhao, Wenli Zhang, Qiang Yao. Uterine prolapse with complete placenta praevia and umbilical hernia in pregnancy: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 602
-604
. |
[8] |
B. Dullaert, S. Schroven, Y. Jacquemyn. The effect of maternal vitamin D status on pregnancy outcome and child health in the first year of life[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 677
-681
. |
[9] |
K. Lachowski, M. Lachowska, D. Paluszyńska, B. Królak-Olejnik. Two-headed twin in a triplet pregnancy after in vitro
fertilization – A case report and review of the literature [J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 782
-786
. |
[10] |
A.H. Kaya, E. Tekgunduz, S. Akpınar, G. Bozdağ, T.N. Yiğenoğlu, A. Merdin, S. Namdaroglu, O. Kayıkcı, F. Altuntaş. Assessment of ovarian reserve with anti-Mullerian hormone in women following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 127
-130
. |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|