|
|
|
Effects of the colour and design of a new pelvic examination chair on comfort during gynaecological examination |
C. Stenfelt1, *( ), L. Ydenius1, S. Lindberg2, J. Spira3, G. Edelstam4, 5 |
1Livio Gärdet, Storängsvägen 10, SE 115 42 Stockholm(Sweden) 2RISE Bioeconomy, Box 5604, SE 114 86 Stockholm(Sweden) 3InSpira Medical AB, Tyresö(Sweden) 4Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, SE 182 88, Stockholm, Sweden 5Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden |
|
|
Abstract Objectives: The main question was whether the colour of a new design of pelvic examination chair could affect how the examination procedure was perceived. A prototype was constructed without vertical leg support and with built-in heating in the upholstery. To improve integrity, the perineum was exposed only during the examination. Main Outcome Measures: The patients were invited to evaluate the two different chair colours used, light blue and off-white, respectively. After vaginal ultrasound, the patients answered an anonymous questionnaire about their experience of the examination and how they perceived the comfort, warmth, integrity and colour of the chair. There were also questions regarding the absence of vertical leg support. Results: The questionnaire evaluation demonstrated the importance of colour since integrity was rated significantly higher in the light-blue chair than in the off-white. Similarly, the blue chair was experienced as significantly more comfortable than the white. Conclusions: The effect of colour was investigated in a new pelvic examination chair without vertical leg support, developed to suit men, women and also non-binary and transgender persons. It was also designed for increased comfort and integrity. The experience of colour had a significant positive (p < 0.001) effect on how the comfort, integrity and the absence of vertical leg support were perceived.
|
Submitted: 28 February 2019
Accepted: 29 April 2019
Published: 15 August 2020
|
Fund: Vinnova and the Stockholm County Council |
*Corresponding Author(s):
C. Stenfelt
E-mail: camilla.stenfelt@livio.se
|
[1] |
Yanikkerem E., Ozdemir M., Bingol H., Tatar A., Karadeniz G.: “Women's attitudes and expectations regarding gynaecological examination”. Midwifery, 2009, 25(5), 500-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.006
|
[2] |
Larsen L.P., Olesen F.: “Women's knowledge of and attitude towards organized cervical smear screening”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1998, 77(10), 988-96.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.771008.x
pmid: 9849843
|
[3] |
Hilden Midenius K., Langhoff-Roos J., Wijma B., Schei B.: “Women's experiences of the gynecologic examination, factors associated with discomfort”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2003, 82(11), 1030-6.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00253.x
pmid: 14616277
|
[4] |
Neuhaus L.R., Memeti E., Schäffer M.K., Zimmermann R., Schäffer L.: “Using a wrap skirt to improve the pelvic examination experience”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2016, 95(5), 534-40.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.12869
pmid: 26866358
|
[5] |
Bates C.K., Carroll N., Potter J.: “The challenging pelvic examination”. J Gen Intern Med, 2011, 26(6), 651-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1610-8
|
[6] |
Millstein S.G., Adler N.E., Irwin C.E. Jr.: “Sources of anxiety about pelvic examinations among adolescent females”. J Adolesc Health Care, 1984, 5(2), 105-11.
doi: 10.1016/s0197-0070(84)80008-x
pmid: 6706788
|
[7] |
Seymore C., Du Rant R.H., Jay M.S., Freeman D., Gomez L., Sharp C., Linder C.W.: “Influence of position during examination, and sex of examiner on patient anxiety during pelvic examination”. J Pediatr, 1986, 108(2), 312-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)81011-3
pmid: 3944721
|
[8] |
Ehrnberger K., Räsänen M., Börjesson E., Hertz A.C., Sundbom C.: “The androchair, performing gynaecology through the practice of gender critical design”. The Design Journal, 2017, 20, 181-198 (http//androstolen.se).
doi: 10.1080/14606925.2016.1261510
|
[9] |
Birren F.: “Color and human response”. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1978, 141.
|
[10] |
Mehrabian A.: “Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory, Implications for personality, social, environmental, and developmental studies”. Cambridge, MA, Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1980.
|
[11] |
Valdez P., Mehrabian A.: “Effects of color on emotions”. J Exp Psychol Gen, 1994, 123(4), 394-409.
doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.394
pmid: 7996122
|
[12] |
Edelstam G., Makdessi M., Moberg M., Olovsson M., Spira J.: “Optimised gynaecological examination with a new concept of a pelvic examination chair”. Sex Reprod Healthc, 2019, 19, 84-87
doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.01.001
pmid: 30928140
|
[13] |
Szymoniak K.: “Women's expectations towards gynecological examination”. Ann Acad Med Stetin, 2014, 60(1), 52-9.
pmid: 25518093
|
[14] |
Broadmore J., Carr-Gregg M., Hutton J.D.: “Vaginal examinations, women's experiences and preferences”. N Z Med J., 1986, 22, 99(794), 8-10.
pmid: 3456108
|
[15] |
Wijma B., Gullberg M., Kjessler B.: “Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1998, 77(4), 422-8.
pmid: 9598951
|
[16] |
Peitzmeier S.M., Khullar K., Reisner S.L., Potter J.: “Pap test use is lower among female-to-male patients than non-transgender women”. Am J Prev Med, 2014, 47(6), 808-1
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.031
|
[17] |
Peitzmeier S.M., Reisner S.L., Harigopal P., Potter J.: “Female-to-male patients have high prevalence of unsatisfactory Paps compared to non-transgender females, implications for cervical cancer screening”. J Gen Intern Med, 2014, 29(5), 778-84.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2753-1
|
[18] |
Moegelin L., Nilsson B., Helström L.: “Reproductive health in lesbian and bisexual women in Sweden”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2010, 89(2), 205-9.
doi: 10.3109/00016340903490263
pmid: 20121335
|
[19] |
Boyer S.C., Pukall C.F.: “Pelvic examination experiences in women with and without chronic pain during intercourse”. J Sex Med, 2014, 11(12), 3035-50.
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12701
|
[20] |
Brüggemann A.J., Swahnberg K.: “Patients’ silence towards the healthcare system after ethical transgressions by staff, associations with patient characteristics in a cross-sectional study among Swedish female patients”. BMJ Open, 2012, 2(6), 1-9.
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|