Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (2): 291-295    DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog.2020.02.5235
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries
D. Yang1, H. F. Zhang1, Q. Liu1, Y. N. Li1, J. Zhang1, *(), T. Zheng2
1Department of Obstertrics and Gynecology, Medical Center of Severe Cardiovascular of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Center of Severe Cardiovascular of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Download:  PDF(668KB)  ( 177 ) Full text   ( 6 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The aim of this study was to define the pregnancy outcomes in women with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (cc-TGA). The medical databases at Anzhen Hospital between January 2011 and March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data of 12 pregnant women with cc-TGA were collected. One patient was lost at 35 weeks of gestation. There were 8 (72.7%) term births and 3 (27.3%) premature births. Of the 11 deliveries, 2 (18.2%) were vaginal and 9 (81.8%) were cesarean. The baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was I - II in 11 patients, II - III in 7 patients, and III - IV in 5 patients in the third trimester (P = 0.037). In the third trimester, 6 (50%) patients became symptomatic and experienced heart function deterioration compared with asymptomatic patients (6 vs. 0, P = 0.002). In the third trimester, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was identified in 11 patients: 2 with mild TR, 4 with moderate TR, and 5 with severe TR. Five symptomatic patients developed severe TR, in which the rate of TR was significantly higher than that of asymptomatic patients (5 vs. 0, P = 0.015). No difference was found in NYHA class between the third trimester and 1 week after delivery (P > 0.05). One patient died of ventricular fibrillation at 3 months postpartum. Successful pregnancy can be achieved by most women with cc-TGA. The deterioration of right ventricular function is common among pregnant women with cc-TGA, and severe TR is a high risk factor resulting in deterioration of the right ventricular function.

Key words:  pregnancy      congenitally corrected transposition of the great artery      systemic right ventricle     
Published:  15 April 2020     
*Corresponding Author(s):  J. Zhang     E-mail:  zhangjundoc@126.com

Cite this article: 

D. Yang, H. F. Zhang, Q. Liu, Y. N. Li, J. Zhang, T. Zheng. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 291-295.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.02.5235     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2020/V47/I2/291

Table 1  — Baseline characteristics in women with cc-TGA
Patient Number Age Parity Type of TGA Other cardiac defect and arrhythmia NYHA class before pregnancy
1 27 0 IDD Dexiocardia, pulmonary atresia, VSD, ASD II
truncus arteriosus communis, CRBBB
2 24 1 SLL VSA, ASD II
3 21 0 SLL VSA, ASD I
4 30 0 SLL APB I
5 34 1 SLL APB I
6 23 0 SLL VSD, PS I
7 30 1 SLL Ebstein’s Anomaly, II-AVB I
8 27 0 SLL - I
9 30 1 SLL - I
10 29 0 SLL Dexiocardia I
11 24 0 SLL - II
12 26 0 SLL Bicuspid aortic valve associated with mild aor- I
tic valve stenosis
Table 2  — Clinical data during pregnancy
Patient number Symptom Occurrence time Cardiac complication Bnp (pg/ml) SpO2 (%) Obstetrical complication
1 Yes 31 PAH - 84 -
2 No - 38 98.8 -
3 No - - 95.8 -
4 Yes 36 Sinus tachycardia 87 98.9 -
5 Yes 28 HF 2760 99.6 Sever PE
6 Yes 36 Sinus tachycardia 123 98 -
7 No - 55 97.3 -
8 No - - - 98.3 GDM
9 No - - 84 98.9
10 No - - 168 96.1
11 Yes 25 62 98.3
12 Yes 33 Sinus tachycardia 96 97.7
Table 3  — Heart function class and Echocardiographic parameters in 3rd trimester and 1 week after delivery
Patient
Number
NYHA class
3rd trimester 1 week after delivery
EF of SRV (%)
3rd trimester 1 week after delivery
Degree of TR
3rd trimester 1 week after delivery
1 55 52 Moderate Mild
2 53 50 Moderate Moderate
3 60 50 Moderate Moderate
4 60 60 Severe Mild
5 53 46 Severe Moderate
6 40 - Severe Severe
7 50 55 Moderate Mild
8 60 60 Mild Mild
9 - - Mild Mild
10 56 55 None None
11 - 45 - Severe -
12 55 59 Severe Severe
Table 4  — Mode of delivery, use of anaesthesia, and fetal outcome
Patient Number Gestational age at birth Mode of delivery Anaesthesia Birthweight (g) Apgar score
1 31+3 CS Epidural 1520 2010/10/10
2 37 CS Epidural 3030 2010/10/10
3 39 CS Spinal 3660 2010/10/10
4 38 CS Epidural 3930 2010/10/10
5 30+6 CS Epidural 980 2007/8/9
6 38 CS Epidural 3530 2010/10/10
7 38+ CS Epidural 3630 2010/10/10
8 40 VD - 3700 2010/10/10
9 39 VD - 3350 2010/10/10
10 38+ CS Spinal 2930 2010/10/10
11 Loss of follow-up -
12 34+ CS Epidural 2850 2010/10/10
[1] Warnes C.A.: “Congenital heart disease for the adult cardiologist: Transposition of the great arteries”. Circ. J., 2006, 114, 2699.
[2] Dobson R., Danton M., Nicola W., Hamish W.: “The natural and unnatural history of the systemic right ventricle in adult survivors”. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2013, 145, 1493.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.030 pmid: 23490252
[3] Graham T.P. Jr, Bernard Y.D., Mellen B.G., Celermajer D., Baumgartner H., Cetta F., et al.: “Long-term outcome in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2000, 36, 255.
doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00682-3 pmid: 10898443
[4] Rog B., Salapa K., Okolska M., Dluzniewska N., Werynski P., Podolec P., et al.: “Clinical Evaluation of Exercise Capacity in Adults with Systemic Right Ventricle”. Tex. Heart Inst. J., 2019, 46, 14.
[5] Kaleschke G., Baumgartner H.: “Pregnancy in congenital and valvular heart disease”. Heart, 2011, 97, 1803.
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300369 pmid: 21984173
[6] Elkayam U., Goland S., Pieper P.G., Silversides C.K.:“High-Risk Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy: Part II”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2016, 68, 502.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.050 pmid: 27443948
[7] Bowater S.E., Selman T.J., Hudsmith L.E., Clift P.F., Thompson P.J., Thorne S.A.: “Long-term outcome following pregnancy in women with a systemic right ventricle: is the deterioration due to pregnancy or a consequence of time”? Congenit. Heart Dis., 2013, 8, 302.
doi: 10.1111/chd.12001
[8] Gelson E., Curry R., Gatzoulis M.A., Swan L., Lupton M., Durbridge J., et al.: “Pregnancy in women with a systemic right ventricle after surgically and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2011, 155, 146.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.021 pmid: 21276649
[9] Regitz-Zagrosek V., Roos-Hesselink J.W., Bauersachs J., Blomström-Lundqvist C., Cífková R., De Bonis M., et al.: “2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy”. Eur. Heart J., 2018, 39, 3165.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340 pmid: 30165544
[10] Shahab H., Ashiqali S., Atiq M.: “Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Art8, 9 eries in a Septuagenarian from the Developing Country of Pakistan”. Cureus, 2018, 10, e2737.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.2737 pmid: 30087813
[11] Ouali S., Kacem S., Gribaa R., Neffeti E., Remedi F., Boughzela E.: “Successful pregnancies after transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy in a woman with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Egypt. Heart J., 2017, 69, 219.
doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.05.002 pmid: 29622980
[12] Wissocque L., Mondésert B., Dubart A.E.: “Late diagnosis of isolated congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in a 92-year old woman. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2016, 49, 1524.
[13] Kowalik E., Klisiewicz A., Biernacka E.K., Hoffman P.:“Pregnancy and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in women with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2014, 125, 154.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.10.022 pmid: 24568958
[14] Connolly H.M., Grogan M., Warnes C.A.: “Pregnancy Among Women With Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1999, 33, 1692.
doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00046-7 pmid: 10334444
[15] Rudski L.G., Lai W.W., Afilalo J., Hua L., Handschumacher M.D., Chandrasekaran K., et al.: “Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography: endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography”. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr., 2010, 23, 685.
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010 pmid: 20620859
[16] Lopez L., Colan S.D., Frommelt P.C., Ensing G.J., Kendall K., Younoszai A.K., et al.: “Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report From the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council”. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr., 2010, 23, 465.
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.019 pmid: 20451803
[17] Jain V.D., Moghbeli N., Webb G., Srinivas S.K., Elovitz M.A., Paré E.: “Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: the impact of a systemic right ventricle”. Congenital Heart Dis., 2011, 6, 147.
doi: 10.1111/chd.2011.6.issue-2
[18] Cataldo S., Doohan M., Rice K., Trinder J., Stuart A.G., Curtis S.L.:“Pregnancy following Mustard or Senning correction of transposition of the great arteries: A retrospective study”. BJOG, 2016, 123, 807.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13508 pmid: 26138245
[19] Guédès A., Mercier L.A., Leduc L., Bérubé L., Marcotte F., Dore A.: “Impact of Pregnancy on the Systemic Right Ventricle After a Mustard Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries”. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2004, 44, 433.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.037 pmid: 15261944
[20] Deng L., Xu J., Tang Y., Sun H., Liu S., Song Y.: “Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Surgery in Patients With Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries”. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 2018, 7, e008127.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008127 pmid: 29874165
[1] Ali S. Alqahtani. Seroprevalence of Dengue virus among pregnant mothers and their-newborn infants in the southwest of Saudi Arabia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 741-743.
[2] M. Elmahdy, I. Elfourtia, H. Maghraby. Office hysteroscopy in cases of recurrent implantation failure; Do or not to do[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 723-728.
[3] L.L. Xu, J.Q. Li, Y.Q. Pu, C. Zhou, S.W. Feng, Q. Luo. Effect of prenatal depression during late pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 681-686.
[4] Y.X. Wang, M. Zhong, H. Yi, H.F. He. Detection of group B streptococcus colonization in cervical and lower vaginal secretions of pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 669-674.
[5] I.F. Urunsak, U.K. Gulec, E. Eser, M. Sucu, C. Akcabay, S. Buyukkurt. The role of dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm and high-risk term pregnancies[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 664-668.
[6] S. Han, S. Choi, S. Nah, Y.H. Lee. Preterm labor in mild carbon monoxide poisoning: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 805-806.
[7] H.S.O. Abduljabbar, H. Abduljabar. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the reported symptoms of Covid 19 in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 632-637.
[8] M. Varras, C. Loukas, N. Nikiteas, V.K. Varra, F.N. Varra, E. Georgiou. Comparison of laparoscopic surgical skills acquired on a virtual reality simulator and a box trainer: an analysis for obstetrics-gynecology residents[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 755-763.
[9] H. Yolli, M.E. Demir, R. Yildizhan. Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin-2 (Ngal) levels in preeclampsia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 519-523.
[10] K. Chikazawa, K. Imai, T. Kuwata, K. Takagi. Prophylactic laparoscopic adnexal surgery with low-pressure CO2 insufflation for ovarian cysts during the late first trimester or second trimester of pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 537-540.
[11] J. A. Villarreal-Rodriguez, L. G. Mancillas Adame, J. Maldonado-Sanchez, A. Guzmán-López, O. R. Treviño-Montemayor, J. G. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, D. Saldívar-Rodríguez. A randomized controlled trial comparing acarbose vs. insulin therapy for gestational diabetes in individuals with inadequate glycemic control by diet alone[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 552-555.
[12] J. Ogawa, S. Suzuki. Risk factors of self-interruption of medications for mental disorders in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 576-578.
[13] A. Daniilidis, G. Dryllis, G. Chorozoglou, M. Politou, R. Dampali, K. Dinas. Substitution of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women with iron supplement: A prospective randomized clinical study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 579-583.
[14] Z.Y. Chang, R. Cao, R.C. Xu, Y. Cheng, Q.J. Wan. Pregnancy in a peritoneal dialysis patient undergoing intermittent peritoneal dialysis during the third trimester of pregnancy: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 596-599.
[15] C.Y. Huang, T.C. Chao, H.C. Chien, Y.L. Liu. Outcome of shared decision-making in a patient with primary herpes gingivostomatitis during pregnancy: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 604-606.
No Suggested Reading articles found!