Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 511-515    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4814.2019
Review | Next articles
Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy
A. Pontis1, *(), L. Nappi2, F. Sorrentino2, S. Angioni3
1U.O.C. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale San Francesco, Nuoro, Italy
2Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
3Department of Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Download:  PDF(242KB)  ( 177 ) Full text   ( 12 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Adenomyosis is defined as the heterotopic presence of endometrial mucosa (glands and stroma) abnormally implanted within myometrium with a range of clinical presentations, the most common being heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhoea; nevertheless, patients can also be asymptomatic. This review describes the state of the art of role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of adenomyosis according to recent literature findings. Hysteroscopy offers the advantage of direct visualization of the uterine cavity, and nowadays is performed in the office. It is immediately preceded by a physical exam and a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) to evaluate uterine characteristics. It is offers the possibility of obtaining endometrial/myometrial biopsies under visual control. Laparoscopy is not traditionally considered a diagnostic tool for adenomyosis, but it can have a complementary role in the differential diagnosis of this insidious pathology.

Key words:  Adenomyosis      Laparoscopy      Hysteroscopy     
Published:  10 August 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  A. PONTIS     E-mail:  alesspontis@msn.com

Cite this article: 

A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4814.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I4/511

[1] Ja Young Kim, Yun Gyu Song, Chang-Woon Kim, Moon Ok Lee. Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles for symptomatic focal and diffuse adenomyosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 59-65.
[2] Xiao-Cen Niu, Li-Hua Zhu, Zhi-Da Qian, Li-Li Huang. Disseminated intravascular coagulation developed after suction curettage in an adenomyosis patient: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 189-193.
[3] Yan-Bing Xiao, Meng Mou, Heng-Fang Gu, Hui-Xing Li, Meng-Yuan You, Zhi-Gang Liang, Lei Han. The impact of major uterine wall resection and reconstruction of the uterus (MURU) on uterine hemodynamics and ovarian function in patients with adenomyosis: a clinical study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 132-137.
[4] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[5] M.S. Kim, E.D. Na, H.C. Kim, M. Kim, S.Y. Shin, M.H. Lee. Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn with multiple leiomyomas in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 968-971.
[6] S.Y. Song, G.W. Lee, J.B. Yang, D.E. Kim, D.B. Park, H.J. Yoo. Septic shock caused by abscess formation inside cystic adenomyosis after responsive treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 983-987.
[7] S.J. Liu, W. Lv, M. Shi, B.L. Bi, H.D. Wang. Hysteroscopic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation of myomas: Two case reports and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 991-993.
[8] M. Elmahdy, I. Elfourtia, H. Maghraby. Office hysteroscopy in cases of recurrent implantation failure; Do or not to do[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 723-728.
[9] G. Garuti, E. Castellacci, S. Calabrese, S. Calzolari. Hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception with enhanced vascularity: a study of reliability[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 472-477.
[10] H. Takagi, S. Yamada, J. Sakamoto, S. Fujita, T. Sasagawa. Hemostatic effects of kyukikyogaito in dienogest treatment[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 560-564.
[11] H.S. Song, Y.A. Kim. Placenta percreta at 33 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for adenomyosis and Conservative Surgical Treatment: A case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 600-603.
[12] S. B. Cohen, M. Shapira, A. Baron, J. Bouaziz, R. Mashiach, M. Goldenberg, R. Orvieto. Ultrasonography-guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization of proximally occluded tubes - reproductive outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 872-875.
[13] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[14] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[15] R. T. Ratner, A. Harris, J. Tsaltas, N. Goyal, M. Davies-Tuck, H. Najjar, O. Barel. An eight-year retrospective analysis of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, outcomes and complications in a large multicenter unit[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 699-703.
[1] Eli M. Roth, Michael H. Davidson. PCSK9 Inhibitors: Mechanism of Action, Efficacy, and Safety[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 19(S1): 31 -46 .
[2] Sandeep K. Krishnan, Norman E. Lepor. Acute and Chronic Cardiovascular Effects of Hyperkalemia: New Insights Into Prevention and Clinical Management[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2016, 17(S1): 9 -21 .
[3] Ibrahim Sidiqi, Patrick Alexander. Current Advances in Endovascular Therapy for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 16(1): 36 -50 .
[4] Peter Shalit. Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2014, 15(S1): 38 -46 .
[5] Sophie Mavrogeni, Fabrizio Cantini, Gerald M. Pohost. Systemic Vasculitis: An Underestimated Cause of Heart Failure—Assessment by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2013, 14(1): 49 -55 .
[6] George L. Smith. Appropriate Use Criteria: The Gold Standard, or a Mechanism for the Derogation of Clinical Judgment?[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2011, 12(2): 105 .
[7] Prabhjot Singh Nijjar, Anoop Parameswaran, Aman M. Amanullah. Evaluation of Anomalous Aortic Origins of the Coronaries by 64-Slice Cardiac Computed Tomography[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2007, 8(3): 175 -181 .
[8] . SELF-ASSESSMENT POST-TEST[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2006, 7(S2): 51 -52 .
[9] Alice K. Jacobs. Gender Differences in Coronary Revascularization: Does Age Make a Difference?[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 5(1): 68 -70 .
[10] Jeffrey W. Moses, Stephane Carlier, Issam Moussa. Lesion Preparation Prior to Stenting[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 5(S2): 16 -21 .