Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 466-472    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4683.2019
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after different hysterectomy methods: a population-based cohort study
A. Klimczak1, *(), G. Kilic1, B.S. Unlu1, Y.-L. Lin2, Y.-F. Kuo2, M. Borahay3
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
2Office of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Download:  PDF(450KB)  ( 228 ) Full text   ( 4 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Background: Pelvic floor disorders are expected to greatly increase in the coming years. Many factors have been implicated in the development of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In the last decade, the route of hysterectomy performed has shifted more towards robotic/laparoscopic techniques, and the role that the hysterectomy route plays in the need for future POP repair remains uncertain. Here the authors investigate the association of POP repair following robotic/laparoscopic hysterectomies, as well as vaginal, supracervical, and abdominal modalities. Results: Patients living in the West were more likely to have a prolapse repair post-hysterectomy than those living in the Midwest (HR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01-1.93). Patients with hospital stays ≥ 4 days following hysterectomies were more likely to require future prolapse repairs than those with ≤ 1-day stays (HR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.10-2.65). Compared to abdominal procedures, robotic/laparoscopic modalities were more likely to be associated with prolapse within 18 months of hysterectomies (HR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.13-2.61). However, between 18 and 36 months, both supracervical and vaginal hysterectomies were more likely to be associated with prolapse surgeries (HR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.15-3.34 and HR 1.94; 95% CI: 1.02-3.70, respectively). Conclusions: Region and length of hospital stay significantly impacted the need for future prolapse repair. Among modalities, the association with prolapse repair changes with time.

Key words:  Pelvic organ prolapse      Hysterectomy      Prolapse repair     
Published:  10 June 2019     
*Corresponding Author(s):  A. KLIMCZAK     E-mail:  amklimcz@utmb.edu

Cite this article: 

A. Klimczak, G. Kilic, B.S. Unlu, Y.-L. Lin, Y.-F. Kuo, M. Borahay. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after different hysterectomy methods: a population-based cohort study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 466-472.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4683.2019     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2019/V46/I3/466

[1] Ö. Koşar Can, Ö.T. Güler, Ü. Çabuş, D. Kılıç, C. Kabukçu. Evaluation of sexual functions and quality of life in female patients after hysterectomy for benign symptomatic diseases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 693-700.
[2] E.D. Na, S.H. Choi, H. Park. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for concurrent hysterectomy and cholecystectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 792-796.
[3] P. Phangsuwan, P. Suprasert. Development of abnormal bowel function after simple hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 744-748.
[4] G. Calongos, Y. Tsuji, Y. Ito, M. Handa, Y. Kubota, A. Ida. Short term outcomes of a new non-dissection minimally invasive surgery method for cystocele repair[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 355-358.
[5] K. Tamura, H. Takahashi, S. Uchida, M. Ogoyama, R. Usui, S. Matsubara. Intrauterine balloon failure: unrecognized placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 405-408.
[6] D. Jovanovic, D. R. Milovanovic, I. Jovanovic, M. Folic, V. Jakovljevic. Influence of cytokines on the postoperative period[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 31-36.
[7] N. Haya, I. Feferkorn, F. Fares, N. Azzam, R. Auslender, Y. Abramov. Elastin genetic point mutation and the risk of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 75-78.
[8] H. H. Chill, R. H. Yahya, M. Olek, S. Herzberg, S. Lesser, D. Shveiky. Anatomical outcome and patient satisfaction after two-stitch utero-sacral ligament suspension[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 906-909.
[9] D. Damnjanovic, M. Zamurovic, D. Zamurovic, S. Krusic. Liver rupture as a complication in cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest after vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1031-1033.
[10] E. Chalari, G. Intas, S. Zyga, G. Fildissis, M. Tolia, N. Tsoukalas, A. Yfantis, G. Kyrgias, G. Panoutsopoulos. Preoperative factors affecting the intraoperative core body temperature in elective hysterectomy under general anesthesia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 560-564.
[11] K. Nakamura, K. Nakayama, T. Minamoto, T. Ishibashi, K. Sanuki, H. Yamashita, R. Ono, H. Sasamori, S. Razia, M.M. Hossain, S. Kamrunnahar, M. Ishikawa, S. Kyo. A novel retrograde approach for total laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with severe adhesion in the cul-de-sac[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 565-569.
[12] M. Simonsen, L. Martins Campbell, R. Moretti Marques. Uterine manipulator - low budget option[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 575-577.
[13] M. Meléndez Zalduegui, S. Iglesias Ferreiro, A. Rodríguez Vélez, ML. Monje Beltrán, EM. Vicedo Madrazo, RJ. Martínez Portillo, M. Llobet Roma, M. Marqueta Sánchez. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, a life threatening condition: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 313-316.
[14] A. Daniilidis, K. Chatzistamatiou, M. Siskou, ü. Kalkan, T. Theodoridis, S. Angioni. Vault prolapse occurrence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy performed for benign indications, is there a difference? A systematic review of the literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 183-185.
[15] N. Danandeh Osgui, P. Bastani. Improvement of concomitant symptoms of pelvic organ prolapsed with applied pessary[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 42-44.
No Suggested Reading articles found!