Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2018, Vol. 45 Issue (4): 544-548    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4149.2018
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Predict pregnancy outcomes of prenatal megaureter by prenatal ultrasonography
Sun Young Jung1, Yong Teak Oh1, Suk Young Kim1, *()
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of Investigation: To evaluate clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of prenatally diagnosed megaureter to predict postnatal outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on eight fetuses with megaureter which was defined 5 mm or more in diameter of distal ureter in prenatal ultrasonography between March 2008 and September 2015. The authors investigated gestational age at diagnosis and delivery, Z-score for birth weight, progression of ureter diameter, and grade of hydronephrosis between prenatal and postnatal period, neonatal outcomes. Results: Six cases had unilateral megaureter and two cases had both. Of a total of ten renal units (RU), six RU were on the left side. Median gestational age at diagnosis of megaureter was 32.4 weeks and Z-score for birth weight was -0.88. The last mean ureter dilatation before delivery was 13.3 mm. The median postnatal ureter diameter was 9.5 mm. Number of grade II megaureter was five at the time of diagnosis. All were Group III after birth. The causes of megaureter were classified as follows: four RU of obstructed type at the vesicoureteric junction, one RU of refluxing type, two RU of mixed type, two RU in secondary type, and one RU resolved spontaneously after delivery. Three cases were conservatively managed, while five cases required invasive interventions. Megaureters were managed invasively had a tendency to be diagnosed at an earlier gestational age, in males, bilateral megaureters, combined anomalies, and lower Z-score for birthweight. Conclusion: On prenatal ultrasound, megaureter diagnosed at earlier gestational age, male sex, bilateral megaureters, and lower Z-score for birthweight may more likely require invasive management.
Key words:  Urogenital abnormalities      Hydronephrosis      Ultrasonography      Prenatal diagnosis     
Published:  10 August 2018     
*Corresponding Author(s):  SUK-YOUNG KIM     E-mail:  ksyob@gilhospital.com

Cite this article: 

Sun Young Jung, Yong Teak Oh, Suk Young Kim. Predict pregnancy outcomes of prenatal megaureter by prenatal ultrasonography. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 544-548.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4149.2018     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2018/V45/I4/544

[1] Y. Wang, X.Y. Lu , F. Xu, H.M. Huang , Y. Xu, X.W. Xi. Detection of uterine artery hemodynamic changes in patients with gestational hypertension based on Doppler ultrasonography[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 584-589.
[2] B.F. Zhou, C.X. Duan, D.L. Tang. Methylmalonic acidemia in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 617-619.
[3] M. Özsürmeli, M. Sucu, E. Arslan, S. Büyükkurt. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with echogenic intracardiac focus[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 372-375.
[4] D. Lu, D. Cao, Q. Zhao, X. Chen. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of mosaicism for chromosome t (7; 14) with a favorable outcome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 427-428.
[5] W.B. Wang, Q. Wu, Y. Zhou, X. Zhong, Y. Ge, J. Zhang. A 10-year retrospective study on prenatal cytogenetic analyses[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 248-252.
[6] Q.C. Wu, W.B. Wang, L. Sun, Y.S. Xu, X.J. Xie, X.M. Ma, Z.Y. Su. Mutation analysis of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene in fetuses with thanatophoric dysplasia, type I[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 7-11.
[7] G. Szabó, J. Rigó Jr.. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy of ovarian origin[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 977-979.
[8] E.H. Comert, H. Sal, E.S. Guvendag Guven, S. Guven. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal gallbladder duplication associated with uncommon chromosomal anomaly (46, XX, t(X;10) (p11.2;q24.3) [20])[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 980-981.
[9] G. Capobianco, S. Mantegna, M. Farina, O.E. Gallo, C. Pini, E. Tinacci, P.L. Cherchi, S. Dessole. Saline infusion sonography: technique, advantages and limits for the study of uterus and fallopian tubes. Review and care pathway[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 531-538.
[10] W. Homola, M. Zimmer. Safety of amniocentesis in normal pregnancies and pregnancies considered high-risk due to fetal genetic anomalies – an observational study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 403-407.
[11] J.-E. Park, H.-H. Cha, W. J. Seong. Congenital unilateral pulmonary hypoplasia presenting as cardiac dextroposition on prenatal ultrasonography[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 171-173.
[12] Turgut Aydin, Huseyin Aksoy, Ozge Idem Karadag, Ulku Aksoy, Elif Cinar. A comparative study on therapeutic outcomes and clinical implications of transvaginal and transabdominal guidance during embryo transfer[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 823-827.
[13] D.Y. Ma, G. Liu, C.Y. Luo, A. Liu, J.J. Zhang, P. Hu, J. Cheng, Y.G. Wang, T. Jiang, J.F. Xu. A novel mutation in the mutations in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene in a Chinese patient with typical Rett syndrome and subsequent prenatal diagnosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 924-929.
[14] Shigeo Iijima. A case of body stalk anomaly: the value of adding fetal magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasonography for perinatal management[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 930-932.
[15] S. G. Erzincan, N. C. Sayin, C. Inan, M. A. Yuce, F. G. Varol, S. Basaran. Cell-free DNA testing: is it reliable? A case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 939-941.
No Suggested Reading articles found!