Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2018, Vol. 45 Issue (2): 159-162    DOI: 10.12891/ceog4038.2018
Editorial Article Previous articles | Next articles
No evidence to support the concept that endometrial polyps impair fertility in the majority of cases
J.H. Check1, 2, *(), E. Chang2, 3
1 Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ, USA
2 Cooper Institute for Reproductive Hormonal Disorders, P.C., Mt. Laurel, NJ, USA
3 Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose: To perform an updated literature search to determine whether hysteroscopic polypectomy helps to improve chance of pregnancy in infertile couples or reduce the risk of miscarriage. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a personal review of the literature since 2009 (the last time such a search on the subject of polypectomy for infertility and miscarriage was performed by one of the authors). Results: No new studies were identified except a recent (2014) Cochrane Collaboration review from Polanski et al. was found. These authors had the same objective as we had in our previous publication in which an alleged randomized prospective trial (RCT) suggested that hysteroscopic polypectomy improved pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination (IUI) vs. controls; however they included pregnancies obtained within three months after the procedure but before the four-month study period of IUI. Other flaws of the Perez-Medina study of 2005, that are even more significant, were pointed out by Polanski et al. Conclusions: Though no new studies shedding more insight whether the presence of endometrial polyps can impair fertility potential have been found, more flaws in design and conclusions of the one alleged RCT trail by Perez-Medina have been determined by a Cochrane review leading to the conclusion that there is not one properly designed and conducted RCT that supports hysteroscopic polypectomy to correct infertility in asymptomatic women. Though the possibility exists that irritating the endometrium by polypectomy can promote an inflammatory type endometrium, and thus improve embryo implantation and trophoblast invasion, other less invasive, less risky, less costly procedures can be performed, e.g., a single one swipe endometrial biopsy (now referred to as an endometrial scratch).
Key words:  Endometrial polyp      Hysteroscopy      Endometrial inflammation      Endometrial irritation     
Published:  10 April 2018     
*Corresponding Author(s):  J.H. CHECK     E-mail:  laurie@ccivf.com

Cite this article: 

J.H. Check, E. Chang. No evidence to support the concept that endometrial polyps impair fertility in the majority of cases. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(2): 159-162.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog4038.2018     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2018/V45/I2/159

[1] G. Garuti, E. Castellacci, S. Calabrese, S. Calzolari. Hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception withenhanced vascularity: a study of reliability[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 472-477.
[2] S.B. Cohen, M. Shapira, A. Baron, J. Bouaziz, R. Mashiach, M. Goldenberg, R. Orvieto. Ultrasonography-guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization of proximally occluded tubes - reproductive outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 872-875.
[3] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[4] L. Giannella, K. Mfuta, L. B. Cerami, F. Boselli. Does uterine position affect pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 787-791.
[5] A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.
[6] A. Andrisani, A. Vitagliano, G. Virdis, F. Dessole, R. Cappadona, L. Marin, G. Capobianco, S. Dessole, G. Ambrosini. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and office hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 623-625.
[7] A. Le, L. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Y. Dai, T. H. Xiao, R. Zhuo, R. Yuan, T. Tulandi. Two cases of uterine and vaginal malformations[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 658-660.
[8] I. Rudic Biljic-Erski, M. Vasiljevic, S. Rakic, S. Mihajlovic, O.D. Smiljkovic. The impact of hysteroscopic myomectomy on fertility and pregnancy outcomes of infertile women according characteristics of submucous fibroids[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 235-240.
[9] Lin-lin Guan, Hua-li Wang, Lan-zhou Jiao. Treatment of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm by embolization or hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy: two case reports[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(6): 959-962.
[10] M. Terzic, J. Dotlic, M. Vasiljevic, S. Andrijasevic, M. Norton, S. Terzic, A. S. Laganà, A. Vereczkey, N. Arsenovic. Endometrial polyps in infertility patients: the first study of their clinical characteristics[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 692-698.
[11] G. Garuti, S. Calabrese, G. Baudino, C. Reato, L. Quirino, M. Di Mario. Hysteroscopic removal of cesarean scar pregnancy after primary therapy with methotrexate: a case series[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 856-861.
[12] A. Cohen, Y. Cohen, S. Sualhi, S. Rayman, F. Azem, G. Rattan. Office hysteroscopy for removal of retained products of conception: can we predict treatment outcome?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(5): 683-685.
[13] M.K. Eken, F. Gungor Ugurlucan, G. Ilhan, E. Çöğendez, B. Devranoğlu, B. Keyif, A. Turfanda. Comparison of office hysteroscopy and dilatation & curettage regarding patient comfort, efficacy and quality of life in patients suffering from menorrhagia: prospective randomized study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 599-604.
[14] I. Mazzon, A. Favilli, M. Grasso, V. Moretti, G. Soda, S. Gerli. Intramural uterine hemangioma: an insidious trap of a rare pathology. A case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 624-626.
[15] T. Issat, J. Beta, M.A. Nowicka, A. Durczyński, A.J. Jakimiuk. Pain assessment during outpatient hysteroscopy using room temperature versus warm normal saline solution as a distention medium – a prospective randomized study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(3): 359-363.
No Suggested Reading articles found!