Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2018, Vol. 45 Issue (2): 198-203    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3961.2018
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy using combined suture technique versus conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes
Keun Ho Lee1, Yong Seok Lee1, In Cheul Jeung1, Min Jong Song1, Eun Kyung Park1, *()
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of investigation: To compare surgical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M) and three-port conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (CLM). Materials and Methods: Medical records and videos of 158 patients (79 LESS-M and 79 CLM) were reviewed retrospectively. The authors analyzed technical feasibility and operative outcomes for all patients. Results: Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the number of myomas (2.24 [1–8] vs. 2.41 [1–12]; p = 0.571) and size of the largest myoma (7.04 [4–15] vs. 6.89 [3–15] cm; p = 0.689) between the groups. LESS-M resulted in a significant decrease in blood loss (189 vs. 273 mL; p = 0.020). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the LESS-M group at one and six hours after surgery. Conclusions: LESS-M using V-Loc and extracorporeal suture technique with Polysorb is associated with less blood loss and less postoperative pain.
Key words:  Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy      Combined suture      Conventional instruments      Myoma     
Published:  10 April 2018     
*Corresponding Author(s):  EUN KYUNG PARK     E-mail:  guevara614@catholic.ac.kr

Cite this article: 

Keun Ho Lee, Yong Seok Lee, In Cheul Jeung, Min Jong Song, Eun Kyung Park. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy using combined suture technique versus conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(2): 198-203.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3961.2018     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2018/V45/I2/198

[1] M. Ohta, N. Keira, S. Yoshida, R. Yasuda, Y. Tarumi, H. Tsuchiya, M. Kikai, T. Nomura, T. Tatsumi. The possible involvement of interleukin-6 in congestive heart failure in a postmenopausal woman with uterine fibromatosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 590-595.
[2] F.Q. Sun, T. Wang, X.H. Xu, C. Han, J. Jin. Rare case of bizarre leiomyoma in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 434-437.
[3] M. Liu, J. Liu, J. Chen. Giant broad ligament hysteromyoma with degenertion: report of one case[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 126-128.
[4] S.Y. Jung, H.Y. Cho, S.H. Lee, S. Lim, K.B. Lee. Pregnancy outcomes of a giant primary ovarian leiomyoma in the first trimester[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 135-138.
[5] A. Komatsu, K. Kawakami, H. Koike, T. Nagamatsu, Y. Osuga, T. Fujii. Uterine torsion in the second trimester of pregnancy with a large leiomyoma identified in a cesarean section for abruptio placentae: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1026-1027.
[6] E. Fila, U. Indraccolo, M. Pedriali, G. Scutiero, C. Borghi, P. Greco. Histological pattern of leiomyomas after ulipristal acetate treatment in women: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 792-796.
[7] A.M. Coelho Holanda, F. Osório Marques, I.M. Seabra Leite, J.A. dos Santos Junior. Myomectomy in the 14th week of pregnancy - case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 818-820.
[8] E.H. Comert, H. Sal, E. S. Guvendag Guven, S. Guven. Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis as an uncommon cause of recurrent early pregnancy loss[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 831-832.
[9] L. Giannella, S. Paganelli, L. Sabbioni, L.B. Cerami. Parasitic abdominal wall leiomyoma after open myomectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 848-849.
[10] Ş. Gezer, B. Vural. Double cervix, septate uterus, and longitudinal vaginal septum: a rare Müllerian anomaly with leiomyoma of the uterus[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 648-650.
[11] Zaigui Wu, Fei Ruan, Xiaocen Niu, Jianhong Zhou. Diffuse leiomyomatosis of the cervix: a rare tumor in a rare location. A first report and literature analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 492-493.
[12] B. Karamustafaoglu Balcı, C. Yasa, O. Dural, E. Bastu, F. Gungor Ugurlucan, M. Orhan Sungur, T. Ozkan Seyhan, S. Topuz. Myomectomy over the age of forty[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 216-218.
[13] A. Oride, H. Kanasaki, T. Hara, S. Kyo. Hemoperitoneum from ruptured vein overlying a uterine myoma: a case report and review of the literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 337-339.
[14] F. Chen, J. Cheng, Y. Guo, H. Duan. Puerperal spontaneous prolapse of large pedunculated uterine submucosal myoma after full-term vaginal delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 146-150.
[15] K. Sanuki, K. Nakayama, K. Nakamura, T. Ishibashi, M. Ishikawa, N. Ishikawa, S. Kyo. Rapidly enlarged uterus following microwave endometrial ablation: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 159-160.
No Suggested Reading articles found!