Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 856-861    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3698.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Hysteroscopic removal of cesarean scar pregnancy after primary therapy with methotrexate: a case series
G. Garuti1, *(), S. Calabrese1, G. Baudino2, C. Reato2, L. Quirino1, M. Di Mario1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Hospital of Lodi, Lodi, Italy
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Hospital of Crema (CR), Crema, Italy
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of Investigation: To present the clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) managed by methotrexate (MTX) administration followed by hysteroscopy removal. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken in eight consecutive patients admitted to the present Hospital with a diagnosis of CSP, based on ultrasound assessment. The patients underwent systemic (five patients) or local (three patients) MTX administration for pregnancy termination, followed by hysteroscopy removal. A 27Fr resectoscope was used for hysteroscopy surgery. Results: Mean gestational age was of 7.8 weeks and five patients showed a viable embryo. All pregnancies were terminated after MTX; since drug administration, hysteroscopy removal was carried-out after a mean time of 36.1 days. Hysteroscopy view found type 1 and type 2 CSP in one and six patients, respectively. In one patient hysteroscopy assessment demonstrated a cervical pregnancy instead of a type 1 CSP suspected by ultrasound. Mean operating time was of 20.8 minutes, no further intervention was needed, and neither complications were reported. The mean time of menses resumption was of 35.5 days. After the first menstrual period all patients showed β-hCG level in the non-pregnant range and empty uterine cavities. Conclusions: Termination of CSP by MTX, combined with its hysteroscopic removal, resulted to be safe and effective.
Key words:  Cesarean scar pregnancy      Cervical pregnancy      Ectopic pregnancy      Hysteroscopy      Methotrexate     
Published:  10 December 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  G. GARUTI     E-mail:  giancarlo.garuti@tiscali.it

Cite this article: 

G. Garuti, S. Calabrese, G. Baudino, C. Reato, L. Quirino, M. Di Mario. Hysteroscopic removal of cesarean scar pregnancy after primary therapy with methotrexate: a case series. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 856-861.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3698.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I6/856

[1] G. Garuti, E. Castellacci, S. Calabrese, S. Calzolari. Hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception withenhanced vascularity: a study of reliability[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 472-477.
[2] G.L. Liu, S.C. He, W.J. Shan, H.Y. Chen. Repetitive hydatidiform mole in the cesarean scar: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 607-610.
[3] S.B. Cohen, M. Shapira, A. Baron, J. Bouaziz, R. Mashiach, M. Goldenberg, R. Orvieto. Ultrasonography-guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization of proximally occluded tubes - reproductive outcomes[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 872-875.
[4] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[5] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[6] G. Virdis, F. Dessole, A. Andrisani, A. Vitagliano, R. Cappadona, G. Capobianco, E. Cosmi, G. Ambrosini, S. Dessole. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of three cases and a critical review on the management[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 982-985.
[7] Z. Liu, M. Wan, H. Zhu. Fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy with renal duct cyst[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 986-987.
[8] W.D. Zou, Z.W. Liu, J. Zhang. Intramural pregnancy following transcervical resection of adhesion: a case and review literatures[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1017-1019.
[9] L. Giannella, K. Mfuta, L. B. Cerami, F. Boselli. Does uterine position affect pain intensity during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 787-791.
[10] A. Pontis, L. Nappi, F. Sorrentino, S. Angioni. Differential diagnosis of adenomyosis: the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 511-515.
[11] A. Le, L. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Y. Dai, T. H. Xiao, R. Zhuo, R. Yuan, T. Tulandi. Two cases of uterine and vaginal malformations[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 658-660.
[12] I. Rudic Biljic-Erski, M. Vasiljevic, S. Rakic, S. Mihajlovic, O.D. Smiljkovic. The impact of hysteroscopic myomectomy on fertility and pregnancy outcomes of infertile women according characteristics of submucous fibroids[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 235-240.
[13] M. Meléndez Zalduegui, S. Iglesias Ferreiro, A. Rodríguez Vélez, ML. Monje Beltrán, EM. Vicedo Madrazo, RJ. Martínez Portillo, M. Llobet Roma, M. Marqueta Sánchez. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, a life threatening condition: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 313-316.
[14] A. Dobrosavljevic, B. Nikolic, A. Jurisisc, N. Zečević, R. Aničić, M. Jeftović. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical ectopic pregnancy – case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 139-140.
[15] Jing Fu, Na Hu, Lin Qiao, Qiang Yao. Cornual pregnancy with placenta percreta and uterine rupture at 19 weeks' gestation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 141-142.
No Suggested Reading articles found!