Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 879-881    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3696.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Salpingectomy for tubal sterilization at cesarean section: no extra time and no extra bleeding compared with tubal ligation
T. Ida1, *(), H. Fujiwara2, S. Matsubara2, Y. Taniguchi1, A. Kohyama1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose: A salpingectomy may reduce the probability of the future occurrence of ovarian cancer, and is now increasingly preferred to the tubal ligation as a method of tubal sterilization. This study aimed to determine whether a salpingectomy at cesarean section (CS) requires more time or involves more bleeding compared with tubal ligation. Materials and Methods: This was a historically controlled retrospective observational study. The clinical records of singleton pregnant women who underwent tubal sterilization at CS were examined. Tubal ligation was performed in 45 women in 2013-2014 and a salpingectomy was performed in 22 women in 2015. Results: No significant difference was observed between tubal ligation and salpingectomy groups in terms of median operating time (65.0 and 68.5 minutes for the ligation and the salpingectomy groups, respectively; p = 0.053) or volume of bleeding (847 and 916 ml for the ligation and the salpingectomy groups, respectively; p = 0.475). Conclusion: A bilateral salpingectomy at CS did not involve more time or bleeding than tubal ligation, and may therefore be an option for tubal sterilization during CS.
Key words:  Cesarean section      Ovarian cancer      Salpingectomy      Tubal ligation      Tubal sterilization     
Published:  10 December 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  T. IDA     E-mail:  t-ida@umin.ac.jp

Cite this article: 

T. Ida, H. Fujiwara, S. Matsubara, Y. Taniguchi, A. Kohyama. Salpingectomy for tubal sterilization at cesarean section: no extra time and no extra bleeding compared with tubal ligation. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 879-881.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3696.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I6/879

[1] A.M. Sindiani, H.M. Rawashdeh, E.H. Alshdaifat, O.F. Altal, H. Yaseen, A.A. Alhowary. The association between repeated doses of vaginal PGE2 (Dinoprostone, Prostin®) and both maternal and neonatal outcomes among women in the north of Jordan[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 329-334.
[2] J. Huang, Z. Zhang. Spontaneous umbilical cord vascular rupture before labor for congenital defects with a live birth: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 142-143.
[3] K. Relakis, A. Pontikaki, I. Kosmas, S. Sifakis. Bilateral ascending uterine arteries ligation for conservative management of complete placenta previa: three case reports[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 144-146.
[4] H. Takahashi, Y. Baba, M. Ogoyama, H. Suzuki, A. Ohkuchi, R. Usui, S. Matsubara. Does previous cesarean section per se, especially its number, increase the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion at cesarean section for placenta previa?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 41-46.
[5] H. Kiyak, L. S. Turkgeldi, C. Ozdemir, S. Gunkaya, K. Tolga, A. Gedikbası. Myomectomy during cesarean section: is it a redundant or a feasible procedure?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 881-887.
[6] A. Basha, Z. Falayleh, R. Jabra, S. Attili, Y. Obeidat, L. El-Khatib, A. Ala’eddien Obeidat. Cesarean section: Where are we are now? A comparative study between 1997-1998 and 2015-2016 at a tertiary teaching hospital in a developing country[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 943-947.
[7] G. Virdis, F. Dessole, A. Andrisani, A. Vitagliano, R. Cappadona, G. Capobianco, E. Cosmi, G. Ambrosini, S. Dessole. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of three cases and a critical review on the management[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 982-985.
[8] J. Stulić, I. R. B. Erski, L. Nejković, R. Aničić, A. Ristić, V. Pažin, M. Vasiljević. Preservation of fertility in 19-year-old patient with mucinous ovarian carcinoma[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 1014-1016.
[9] M. Trisovic, O. Mladenovic, J. Bila, K. Lalić, D. Kisic Tepavcevic. The predictive value of metabolic syndrome in the evaluation of pregnancy course and outcome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 776-778.
[10] J.X. Ruan, Y. Chen, Y.Y. Wang, L. Yao, C.Y. He, H.N. Weng. Isolated torsion of bilateral fallopian tubes: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 836-838.
[11] E. Panagiotou, P. Tsikouras, A. Bothou, S. Fotopoulos, S. Zervoudis, D. Deuteraiou, A.B. Chalil, G. Trypsianis, G. Galazios. A comparative study of the contribution of antenatal corticosteroids administration on improving neonatal respiratory function after elective cesarean section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 368-374.
[12] L. Wang, N. Zhao, J. Zhou, M. Xu. Factors for predicting cesarean section during epidural analgesia: a retrospective study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(3): 443-446.
[13] N. Yachida, M. Itsukaichi, K. Haino, T. Usuda, J. Yoshimura, T. Enomoto, M. Yamaguchi, K. Takakuwa. Influence of route of delivery on perinatal outcomes in fetuses with myelomeningocele[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 277-279.
[14] F. Ercan, A. Pekin, M. Sarıkaya, F. Kılıç, O. Balcı, H. Görkemli, A. Acar. A safe procedure for myomectomy during cesarean section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 72-75.
[15] X.W. Sun, X.M. Bai, Q. Chen, J.F. Shen, L. Yang, J.Y. Zhang, X.S. Gu, Q. Yuan, J. Jing, Y. Jin. Preset catheter sheaths for uterine arterial embolization in the cesarean section of pernicious preplacental placenta: its application[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 108-112.
No Suggested Reading articles found!