Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (3): 413-418    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3599.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Responsiveness of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire in a Swedish sample: an observational study
K. Wickström1, J. Spira2, G. Edelstam3, *()
1 Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden and Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden and InSpira Medical AB, Tyresö , Sweden
3 Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala and Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Objective: The objective was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire in a Swedish sample. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients with endometriosis were included in a prospective observational study. Main outcome measures: The changes on the EHP-30 questionnaire after pertubation treatment were compared with the patients’ self-estimated change in pain intensity. The responsiveness to change was evaluated with effect sizes and significance of change (paired t-test). The changes in scores between those who improved / not improved were compared with independent t-test. Results: The changes in the scores were significant for all dimensions on the core questionnaire (p = 0.04-0.0002) for improved patients in contrast to the patients in the stable group where there were no significant changes in any dimension (p = 0.16-0.63). The effect sizes were large (> 0.8) on all core scales except for self-image (0.51) for the improved patients and small on all scales in the non-improved (stable) group (- 0.17-0.35). There were significant differences between the improved and the stable group considering change in most of the core EHP-30 scores. Conclusions: The EHP-30 is responsive to improvement on all core scales and is acceptable, understandable, and applicable in this Swedish sample.
Key words:  Endometriosis      Pain      Quality of life      EHP-30      Responsiveness     
Published:  10 June 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  G. EDELSTAM     E-mail:  Greta.Edelstam@ds.se

Cite this article: 

K. Wickström, J. Spira, G. Edelstam. Responsiveness of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire in a Swedish sample: an observational study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(3): 413-418.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3599.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I3/413

[1] H. Takagi, S. Yamada, J. Sakamoto, S. Fujita, T. Sasagawa. Hemostatic effects of kyukikyogaito in dienogest treatment[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 560-564.
[2] K. Chmaj-Wierzchowska, M. Wojciechowska, I. Parda, K. Plagens-Rotman, P. Rzymski, M. Wilczak. How do health problems affect the quality and everyday life of patients with endometriomas?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 571-575.
[3] Y. Akdemir, M. Karadeniz. A psychological factor associated with pain during intrauterine device insertion: emotional reactivity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 335-340.
[4] X.J. Shi, L.B. Shi, S.Y. Zhang. Mechanistic study of vitamin C attenuation of endometriotic fibrosis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(3): 383-390.
[5] M. Ζafrakas, Κ. Κοtronis, P. Papasozomenou, P. Eskitzis, G. Grimbizis. Extracellular matrix metalloproteinases in the etiopathogenesis of endometriosis: a systematic review and critical appraisal[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 147-153.
[6] A. Camtosun, S. Bicer. The impact of Double J stent on the quality of sexual life and job performance[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 199-201.
[7] H.K. Kim, S.H. Hye Park, C.J. Joo Kim, J.Y. Kwon, J. Namkung. Large nabothian cyst with chronic pelvic pain: case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 1-3.
[8] G. Jarząbek-Bielecka, M. Mizgier, M. Chuchracki, M. Pisarska-Krawczyk, E. Jakubek, W. Kędzia. Lower abdominal pain as a problem in child gynecology[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 4-6.
[9] K.Y. Yun, S.Y. Hwang, H.J. Lee, S.C. Kim, J.K. Joo, D.S. Suh, K.H. Kim, K.S. Lee. The association of body mass index with incidence, stage and recurrence of endometriosis: case-control study in Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 53-56.
[10] Hue HJ, Kim SK, Choi JY, Suh DH, Kim KD, No JH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Kim YB, Jeon HW. Previous ovarian surgery increases the risk of tubal factor infertility[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 84-88.
[11] H.-H. Lee, M.-J. Mun, T.-H. Kim, Y.-S. Kim, W.-C. Jang, J.-Y. Hwang. Relationships between vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms and endometriosis in Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 876-880.
[12] A. Vitagliano, A. Andrisani, F. Dessole, G. Virdis, R. Cappadona, L. Marin, G. Capobianco, S. Dessole, G. Ambrosini. Rectovaginal endometriosis: head to head comparison between sonovaginography and magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 888-891.
[13] C. Hayashi, K. Matsumoto, K. Shinya, T. Nakajima, T. Nakao, A. Komatsu, F. Chishima, K. Kawana. The expression of angiotensin II receptors mRNA in granulosa-lutein cells in endometriosis patients who underwent ovarian surgery before in vitro fertilization[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 910-913.
[14] Songping Liu, Xin Tian, Hongyan Cui, Qiong Zhang, Keqin Hua. Feasibility of serum-free culture in isolating endometriotic stem cells[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 920-923.
[15] M. Paliga, S. Horák. Relationship between endometriosis and vitamin D status – a review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 674-678.
No Suggested Reading articles found!