Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 923-928    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3592.2017
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Ovarian response predictive model in different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF/ICSI treatment
J. Micic1, 2, *(), L. Surlan1, J. Dotlic1, 2, N. Milic3, S. Vidakovic1, 2, N. Radunovic1, 2
1 Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
2 Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
3 Department for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Download:  PDF
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of investigation: Assesment of biomarkers of the ovarian reserve for ovarian response prediction using different controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatments. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 363 patients who underwent assisted reproduction at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Belgrade, Serbia. Antral follicle count (AFC), serum AMH, inhibin B, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and progesterone were measured on the second cycle day prior to stimulation commencement. Three types of ovulation stimulation protocols were used. The number and quality of obtained oocytes were used for evaluation of the ovarian response. Results: Patients’ age, number of antral follicles, AMH level, and FSH/LH ratio were confirmed as predictors of the number of obtained oocytes. The AFC was the main parameter that influenced the number of obtained oocytes regardless of selected stimulation protocol. Conclusion: The individualization of stimulation protocols may be further improved by using both AFC- and AMH-tailored approach.
Key words:  Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)      Ovarian reserve      anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)      Antral follicle count (AFC)      Ovarian response     
Published:  10 December 2017     
*Corresponding Author(s):  J. MICIC     E-mail:  jdmicic@yahoo.com

Cite this article: 

J. Micic, L. Surlan, J. Dotlic, N. Milic, S. Vidakovic, N. Radunovic. Ovarian response predictive model in different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF/ICSI treatment. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(6): 923-928.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3592.2017     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2017/V44/I6/923

[1] H. Saleh, F. Moiety, A.F. Agameya, Y. Elkassar, R.M. El Sharakwy, D. Zeidan, H. Elmeligy. Comparison between antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormonal level in the prediction of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients: implications in personalizing ovarian stimulation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(2): 166-173.
[2] Hue HJ, Kim SK, Choi JY, Suh DH, Kim KD, No JH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Kim YB, Jeon HW. Previous ovarian surgery increases the risk of tubal factor infertility[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(1): 84-88.
[3] N. Eamudomkarn, L. Salang, K. Seejorn, P. Kleebkaow. Comparison of impact on ovarian reserve between laparoscopic and laparotomy ovarian cystectomy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(5): 779-783.
[4] L.-S. Wang, X.-L. Zhao, X.-A. Cai, G.-F. Fu. Age specific reference intervals of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration of 1,253 women with healthy females in infertility center[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 526-530.
[5] A.H. Kaya, E. Tekgunduz, S. Akpınar, G. Bozdağ, T.N. Yiğenoğlu, A. Merdin, S. Namdaroglu, O. Kayıkcı, F. Altuntaş. Assessment of ovarian reserve with anti-Mullerian hormone in women following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 127-130.
[6] Haining Luo, Kun Yang, Ying Han, Yunshan Zhang. A case report of clinical pregnancy in which oocyte retrieval was carried out in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 45(4): 629-631.
[7] H.U. Yuvacı, S. Uysal, H. Haltaş, B. Sırav, C.I. Duvan, N. Turhan, N. Seyhan. The effect of non-ionizing radiation on the ovarian reserves of female rats[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(4): 605-610.
[8] A. Eser, D. Hizli, M. Namuslu, H. Haltas, N. Kosus, A. Kosus, H. Kafali. Protective effect of curcumin on ovarian reserve in a rat ischemia model: an experimental study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 44(3): 453-457.
No Suggested Reading articles found!