Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2016, Vol. 43 Issue (3): 374-378    DOI: 10.12891/ceog3111.2016
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Maternal-fetal prognosis in HELLP syndrome in a level 3 maternal-fetal care centre
D. Socolov1, 2, C. Ilea1, 2, *(), I. Anghelache Lupascu1, 2, I. Blidaru1, 2, A. Luca2, M. Radescu2, A. Carauleanu1, 2, R. Socolov1, 3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, “Gr.T.Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi
2“Cuza Vodă” University Hospital, Iasi; 3 “Elena Doamna” University Hospital, Iasi (Romania)
Download:  PDF(81KB)  ( 10 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose of investigation: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcome and prognosis in pregnant women with HELLP syndrome. Materials and Methods: Medical records of eligible pregnant women with HELLP syndrome were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in terms of maternal complication, as well as the types of delivery. Perinatal outcome were evaluated in terms of Apgar score, birth weight, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Results: The leading maternal complications associated with HELLP syndrome were the following: severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, placental abruption, acute pulmonary edema, acute kidney failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome, and immediate maternal death. The most prominent neonatal outcomes associated with HELLP syndrome were: antenatal fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity. Conclusion: The management and delivery of the patients with HELLP syndrome must take place in a tertiary referral maternal and fetal care centre.
Key words:  Pregnancy      HELLP syndrome      Severe preeclampsia      Placental abruption      Prematurity     
Published:  10 June 2016     
*Corresponding Author(s):  I. CIPRIAN     E-mail:  cilea1979@yahoo.com

Cite this article: 

D. Socolov, C. Ilea, I. Anghelache Lupascu, I. Blidaru, A. Luca, M. Radescu, A. Carauleanu, R. Socolov. Maternal-fetal prognosis in HELLP syndrome in a level 3 maternal-fetal care centre. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 43(3): 374-378.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog3111.2016     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2016/V43/I3/374

[1] Amanda M. Wang, Alan J. Lee, Shannon M. Clark. The effects of overweight and obesity on pregnancy-related morbidity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 999-1009.
[2] Leen Van den Eeden, Greet Leysens,Dominique Mannaerts, Yves Jacquemyn. Air pollution: cardiovascular and other negative effects on pregnancy: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1010-1016.
[3] Xin Du, Qian Zou, Yu-Lan Liu. Transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by uterine artery pre-ligation: a report of 4 cases[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1044-1047.
[4] Marcelo Epsztein Kanczuk, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Alison Pighills, Antony Ji, Casey Steele, Daniel Bartlett. The time to perform spinal or general anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients requiring emergency caesarean delivery: a prospective crossover simulation study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1099-1106.
[5] Noor Hazim Abdulkareem, Elham Hazeim Abdulkareem. SARS-CoV-2 detection in pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1141-1145.
[6] Min Jung Kim, Hee-Sook Lim, Hae-Hyeog Lee, Tae-Hee Kim, Yongsoon Park. Dietary assessment, nutrition knowledge, and pregnancy outcome in high-risk pregnant Korean women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1178-1185.
[7] Neha Sethi, Ann Gee Tan, Maherah Kamarudin, Sofiah Sulaiman. Successful delivery of a twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of literature[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1232-1247.
[8] Luca Roncati, Greta Gianotti, Elisa Ambrogi, Giovanna Attolini. COVID-19 in pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 778-780.
[9] Silvia Amodeo, Giulia Bonavina, Anna Seidenari, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Antonio Farina. Real-world implementation and adaptation to local settings of first trimester preeclampsia screening in Italy: a systematic review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 812-819.
[10] Yu Deng, Zhan-Hui Ou, Min-Na Yin, Pei-Ling Liang, Zhi-Heng Chen, Abraham Morse, Ling Sun. Age and anti-Műllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization with diminished ovarian reserve[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 835-841.
[11] Serdar Balci. The effect of ultraviolet index measurements on levels of vitamin D andinflammatory markers in pregnant women[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 888-892.
[12] Anna M. Rubinshtein, Oleg V. Golyanovskiy. Obstetric outcomes in women of advanced maternal age after assisted reproduction[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 893-900.
[13] Qian Hu, Mohammed Sharooq Paramboor, Tao Guo. Diagnosis and management of intramural ectopic pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 974-979.
[14] Ovadya Rosenbluh, Asnat Walfisch. Birth defects associated with obesity[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 472-477.
[15] Sara Oday, Maysoon Sharief. The role of salivary progesterone and cervical length measurement in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 509-513.
No Suggested Reading articles found!