Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2014, Vol. 41 Issue (5): 583-586    DOI: 10.12891/ceog16552014
Case Report Previous articles | Next articles
Heart failure, metabolic acidosis, and postoperative multiple organ failure after anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with Takayasu arteritis: a case report
Meiying Chi1, *, , Lifeng Qi2, , Ailan Cai1, Yanwei Zhang1, Fengguang Li1, Xinquan Jia1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Shandong
2Department of Neurology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Shandong (China)
Download:  PDF(57KB)  ( 6 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
The incidence of Takayasu arteritis (TA) is approximately one in 200,000. The prevalence of this disease is higher among Asian women under the age of 30. Most pregnant women with mild TA receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections. Despite difficulties in measuring blood pressure, the entire surgical process, including the administering of anesthesia, is generally stable. Studies in this area are rare. The authors report a case of a pregnant woman with TA who received anesthesia for a cesarean section and then suffered for heart failure, metabolic acidosis, and postoperative multiple organ failure. The authors hope to contribute to the clinical studies on the subject of anesthesia for pregnant women with TA.
Key words:  Pregnant      Takayasu arteritis      Patients anesthesia      Cesarean section     
Published:  10 October 2014     
*Corresponding Author(s):  MEIYING CHI     E-mail:  mylfcn@163.com
About author:  These authors contributed equally.

Cite this article: 

Meiying Chi, Lifeng Qi, Ailan Cai, Yanwei Zhang, Fengguang Li, Xinquan Jia. Heart failure, metabolic acidosis, and postoperative multiple organ failure after anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with Takayasu arteritis: a case report. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014, 41(5): 583-586.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog16552014     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2014/V41/I5/583

[1] Athanasia Tsaroucha, Aliki Tympa Grigoriadou, Tania Moshovou, Kassiani Theodoraki, Aikaterini Melemeni. Efficacy of intrathecally administered fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a double blinded, randomized clinical trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1065-1070.
[2] Eser Ağar, Seda Şahin Aker. Effect of sexual dysfunction on women's preference for delivery methods: a social media-based survey[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1154-1161.
[3] Uros Visic, Tatjana Stopar Pintaric, Tit Albreht, Iva Blajic, Miha Lucovnik. Multimodal stepwise analgesia for reducing opioid consumption after cesarean delivery[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1162-1166.
[4] Lorenz Hinterleitner, Herbert Kiss, Johannes Ott. The impact of Cesarean section on female fertility: a narrative review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 781-786.
[5] Dragan Belci, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Davor Zoričić, Andrea Tinelli, Antonio Malvasi, Michael Stark. Less is more—a minimal approach technique for Cesarean Section[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 478-482.
[6] Eser Ağar, Gökhan Karakoç. Comparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 534-539.
[7] Lejla Kamerić, Anis Cerovac, Mirzeta Rizvanović, Alen Kamerić, Mahira Jahić, Dubravko Habek. Frequency of cesarean section in pregnant women with risk factors for preeclampsia: prospective cohort study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 561-566.
[8] Batool Ali H. Alkhazal, Majed Abdullah Halawani, Ibtihal Omar Alsahabi, Hassan S.O. Abduljabbar. The preferred mode of delivery among primigravida Middle Eastern Women. A questionnaire based study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 567-571.
[9] Faris Mujezinović, Veronika Anzeljc, Monika Sobočan, Iztok Takač. Do women in Slovenia prefer vaginal birth after prior caesarean and what hinders its successful outcome? A single institution retrospective analysis[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 607-614.
[10] Hong Zhang, Wen-Li Liu, Jia-Lin Liu, Ming-Cheng Li. Identification and characteristics of antimicrobial-resistant Group B Streptococcus isolated from maternal birth canals at a university-affiliated hospital, China[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 253-256.
[11] Ryuichi Shimaoka, Tomomi Shiga, Ken-ichirou Morishige. Change in uterine artery blood flow with intrauterine balloon tamponade[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 307-311.
[12] Bara'a Samara, Anton R. Sabella. The knowledge and attitudes of Palestinian women towards different childbirth delivery options[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 138-143.
[13] Jing Wang, Min Zhou, Li Zhang, Long-Xin Zhang. Effective doses 50% and 95% of subarachnoid injection of sufentanil with ropivacaine in lumbar anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 105-109.
[14] J.R. Huang, X. Li, C. Fu, Y.H. Deng, T. Gao, H.W. Zhang. Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 900-905.
[15] N.K. Aref. Rectal misoprostol after cesarean delivery: does it affect recovery of bowel functions? A prospective randomized trial[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 906-910.
No Suggested Reading articles found!