Please wait a minute...
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology  2014, Vol. 41 Issue (1): 24-27    DOI: 10.12891/ceog15212014
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
The cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a single-center review of a five-year experience
M.F. Tao1, *(), R. Rong2, H.F. Shao1, J. Xia3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai
2School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai; 3Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai (China)
Download:  PDF(110KB)  ( 6 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic treatment for ectopic pregnancy by comparing the medical expenses and time of hospitalization of laparoscopic and open surgery for ectopic pregnancy in partial area of Shanghai, China. Materials and Methods: Clinical data of 762 cases with ectopic pregnancy undergoing surgical treatment (307 cases for laparoscopic surgery and 455 cases for open surgery) were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical information including the medical expenses and time of hospitalization was compared. The patients were divided into three groups according to the treatments of different lesions (lesions resection, conservative laparotomy, and exploration group) and were analyzed. Results: The total hospitalization expenses and the top three single costs including surgery, exams, and medicine expenses were higher in laparoscopic group than in open surgery group. There was no significant difference between the two groups on the total time of hospitalization. The hospital days of preoperation were higher but the postoperative hospital days were lower in laparoscopic group than in open surgery group. Compared with the open surgery treatment, the hospitalization expenses of laparoscopic treatment for ectopic pregnancy increased. There was no significant difference on the total hospitalization days. Conclusion: The preoperative waiting period of inpatients increased and the post-operative hospital days reduced in laparoscopic group.
Key words:  Cost      Ectopic pregnancy      Hospitalization days      Laparoscopy     
Published:  10 February 2014     
*Corresponding Author(s):  M.F. TAO     E-mail:  minfangtaocn@163.com

Cite this article: 

M.F. Tao, R. Rong, H.F. Shao, J. Xia. The cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a single-center review of a five-year experience. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014, 41(1): 24-27.

URL: 

https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/10.12891/ceog15212014     OR     https://ceog.imrpress.com/EN/Y2014/V41/I1/24

[1] Ranit Hizkiyahu, Shannon Salvador, Michael H. Dahan. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in a woman with borderline serous ovarian tumor causing a large fluctuating subcutaneous fluid collection: a case report[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 1215-1218.
[2] Üzeyir Kalkan, Murat Yassa, Kadir Bakay, Şafak Hatırnaz. Mechanical bowel preparation prior to gynaecological laparoscopy enables better operative field visualization, lower pneumoperitoneum pressure and Trendelenburg angle during the surgery: a perspective that may add to patient safety[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 842-850.
[3] Basilio Pecorino, Giuseppe Scibilia, Placido Borzì, Maria Elena Vento, Pierfrancesco Veroux, Paolo Scollo. Diminished ovarian reserve and ectopic ovaries in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome candidates for Uterus Transplantation: our experience[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 907-912.
[4] Qian Hu, Mohammed Sharooq Paramboor, Tao Guo. Diagnosis and management of intramural ectopic pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(4): 974-979.
[5] Li-Min Zhou, Jie Duan, Yan Yang. Endoscopic treatment with concomitant ultrasound monitoring of obstructive septum in Robert's uterus following pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 711-714.
[6] Xiao-Hua Li, Jian-Kun Zhou, Jing-Dan Cheng. Application of ultrasound in hepatic pregnancy: a case report and literature review[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(2): 434-438.
[7] Gregory W. Kirschen , Samantha M. Dayton, Sophia Blakey-Cheung, Michael L. Pearl. Which patients on a gynecologic oncology service will require perioperative transfusion? A single-center retrospective cohort study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 47-52.
[8] Ji Eun Park, Ji Kwon Park, Hyun Chul Jo, In Ae Cho, Jong Chul Baek. The association between antenatal corticosteroid use in late-preterm and early-term pregnancy and nonreassuring fetal status[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021, 48(1): 79-84.
[9] J.R. Huang, X. Li, C. Fu, Y.H. Deng, T. Gao, H.W. Zhang. Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 900-905.
[10] L.B. Liu, H.T. Sun, S.F. Liu, R.X. Shi. Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 911-914.
[11] M.S. Kim, E.D. Na, H.C. Kim, M. Kim, S.Y. Shin, M.H. Lee. Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn with multiple leiomyomas in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(6): 968-971.
[12] M. Varras, C. Loukas, N. Nikiteas, V.K. Varra, F.N. Varra, E. Georgiou. Comparison of laparoscopic surgical skills acquired on a virtual reality simulator and a box trainer: an analysis for obstetrics-gynecology residents[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020, 47(5): 755-763.
[13] A. Lavinia Cozlea, E. Előd Élthes, Á. Török, M. Emil Capîlna. Clinical presentation, risk factors and management of ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 914-919.
[14] Y. Wang, F.Y. Luo, Y.D. Xia, L. Mei, L. Xie, H.X. Liu. Clinical analysis of 211 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 948-952.
[15] G. Virdis, F. Dessole, A. Andrisani, A. Vitagliano, R. Cappadona, G. Capobianco, E. Cosmi, G. Ambrosini, S. Dessole. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of three cases and a critical review on the management[J]. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2019, 46(6): 982-985.
No Suggested Reading articles found!